|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Register | FAQ | Guidelines | Photo Gallery | Store | FREE E-Letter | Member Cruises | Members List | Mark Forums Read |
| |||||
| Notices |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#61
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I think some of you missed the origional point. Hank was not bashing the ship, mearly asking if the current pricing model was appropriate for the state of the economy. Personally I have two main concerns about the ship before I reserve a cruise. 1) The cost, it is about double what the rest of the RCCL fleet is going for for a 7 day cruise. It may very well be worth it, but the fact is it is double the price of some of the other ships. 2) The crowd. I have been on all of the current classes of ships. Mariner of the Seas was fantastic and we enjoyed it. We sailed on Freedom last year and it constantly felt overcrowded. Everywhere you went there was a crowd and it was mainly from poor crowd control on the part of the crew. We have been on three cruises since Freedom and I have noticed that all three ships have taken steps to eliminate some of those crowd control issues. I suspect that it is a problem that they have taken a serious look at since they do not want to have those type of issues with Oasis. It has been said that the target market for Oasis is not so much the Crown and Anchor Diamond members but rather the people that have avoided going on a crusie in favor of the "all inclusive" resorts. (If anyone cares I have stayed at several All Inclusives around the Caribbean and cruising is MUCH better) Hopefully that works. Once you get someone hooked on cruises they usually come back. Which is good for the industry as a whole.
__________________
Sovereign of the Seas 03/91, 10/08 Majesty of the Seas 11/04 Mariner of the Seas 12/05 Legend of the Seas 11/06 Enchantment of the Seas 04/07 Jewel of the Seas 12/07 Freedom of the Seas 10/08 Grandeur of the Seas 04/09 Radiance of the Seas 10/09 |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#62
|
|||
|
|||
|
Alseau, Great post and very thought provoking. We agree with much of what you say, especially regarding the Caribbean ports. I sure hope the future is good for RCI so I can make some money on their stock
We think your point on the innovation done by RCI is key. How much are folks willing to pay for that innovation is the business question that you can be sure has kept RCI decision makers awake at night. The other very important business issue is can RCI increase the on-board/per passenger day revenue (to translate, how much can they get you to spend on the ship) to cover the huge debt-service and operating expenses of the Oasis. Three years ago we got so fed up with the nickel and diming stuff we decided to try our first all-inclusive instead of a cruise. To our amazement we loved the AI and the fact that at the end of the week our bill was zero! We have since gone to 3 other AIs and were also pleased with the bang for the buck. Those 4 AIs would have previously been 7 day cruises, but we have pretty much abandoned all 7 day cruises in favor of AIs and now limit our cruising to longer cruises. We still intend to cruise about 60 - 75 days a year, but the 7 day Caribbean market would be our lowest priorty cruise. We recently spent 7 days at a Dreams All-Inclusive that cost us $1600 total (for 2) which included round trip air (Phl to Cancun) + 7 nights. Our total cost for that $1600 booking was $1600! No extra tips, no charge for drinks, no charges for alternative restaurants, no annoying PA announcements etc. And we never had to fight for a nice chair on the beach! We are soon off on a 10 day Ruby Princess Cruise. The cruise cost was about $2000 (for a nice balcony cabin) + our airfare which adds about $350. Based on our experience we expect to spend about $60 per passenger day on the ship (tips and booze) and essentially nothing on the ports (we usually just go to the beach or snorkel). This means that the Ruby will cost about $3000for our 10 day cruise (a pretty good deal) or $150 per passenger day. A comparable cabin on the Oasis would cost us more than twice the price per passenger day (factoring in all the usual charges). We continue to wonder if there is a large enough market willing to pay that extra money to be on the Oasis. It will be very interesting to watch the market over the next year and see what impact the Oasis has on the industry.Hank Last edited by Hlitner; November 16th, 2009 at 01:15 AM. |
|
#63
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
"Throw The Bottle!" |
|
#64
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Future cruises: Oasis of the Seas 08/2010 Western Caribbean Past cruises: Vision of the Seas 05/2001 Alaska Celebrity Summit 04/2004 Panama Canal Celebrity Constellation 07/2006 Baltic Liberty of the Seas 08/2008 Eastern Caribbean Celebrity Millennium 08/2009 Alaska B2B |
|
#65
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree, to get a younger generation cruising is going to take a major change in "cruising".
20-40 years ago cruise ships offered "Country Club" service and the Grand Tour itinerary. See the world in the elegant comfort of your floating hotel. For the last twenty years it has been a focus getting the millions of baby boomers into FUN cruising. More is better, forget the ports (except for shopping), it's the ship and WOW factor. What is it going to take to get the X & Y generation on a cruise ship?
__________________
"Throw The Bottle!" |
|
#66
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
DH and I are 25 and 26 years old respectively and we LOVE cruising as do many of our friends. We've been on a few different types of ships and find that they each have their pros and cons and while we are more likely to gravitate toward bigger ships, we wouldn't rule out a smaller ship in the future(we both loved Grandeur and he really liked Majesty which I have never been on). Oasis is expensive, but it is also really appealing to us. We are both saving up now to go in 2011 and for us it is worth it.For the record we are NOT all inclusive types at all. We don't like the fact that it seems at the inclusives all there is to do is lay on a beach and drink. For us these "floating resorts" are great, since they offer so much more and much of it is included in the cost. Yes, it will be more expensive than a cruise on a smaller ship and yes we have been to these ports before but we love the idea that when we're on the boat there is so much to do. Sure we could do some of the boat activities on land, like mini-golfing, but there is something really cool about golfing while overlooking the ocean. That kind of experience is tough to replicate. I also don't mind the fact that there are restaurants and activities that come with an upcharge. I like that the options are there if we choose to partake, but if we don't want to, there's still a ton of activities included in the cost already. Besides, I'd rather pay a few bucks more for a specialty latte, for example, if I choose than not have specialty lattes available at all. Aside from us, my parents who are both 65 years old are also really excited about this ship and thinking of joining us on this cruise. They have done smaller ships on Celebrity and MSC in the past that were less expensive and had better ports, but they are excited about all the options available to them as well, so I think this ship does have some mass appeal. Anyway, my long and rambling point is, I'm a member of Gen Y and I love cruising, I am excited about Oasis/planning to sail on it and know I'm not alone. Those that don't like Oasis will take advantage of one of RCCL's other ships or another line, and that's totally fine. It's not going to be for everyone, but I now DH and I will go and have a great time
__________________
~*~Karen ~*~ July 97- Celebrity Meridian, Bermuda January 08- Grandeur of the Seas, Key West/Cozumel May 09- Explorer of the Seas, Eastern Carribean/Bermuda. Honeymoon cruise! May 11- Oasis of the Seas, Eastern Carribean??? Maybe ![]() |
|
#67
|
||||
|
||||
|
Karen,
Thank you for your responce. Your comments show why ships like Oasis, with a wide variaty of options, and price points, are positioned well to serve the next wave of cruisers. But the Florida-Caribbean Cruise Association noted that the avergage age of cruisers increased from 49 in 2008 to 50 in 2009.
__________________
"Throw The Bottle!" Last edited by Islandbear; November 16th, 2009 at 03:57 PM. |
|
#68
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
ALSEAU on the Constellation April 11, 2010 doing a 13 night Celebrity Transatlantic Eastbound cruise. Miami to Germany. Captain Wright Daily Log: Click herehttp://www.youtube.com/user/royalcaribbeanoasis Here is the InletCam URL: http://www.inletcam.com/ ALSEAU experiencing the awesome Oasis of the Seas 9/11/2010 Aaarrrr doing a B2B ALSEAU doesn't want to miss anything on the Oasis of the Seas 9/18/2010 Lifetime goal to sleep a year on the seas. Have enjoyed 203 evenings still have 162 nights to go. A trip of a thousand miles begins with a deposit! |
|
#69
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think when the recession is over and people get confidence in the economy again there is going to be a rush back into cruising. A lot of people have put off their vacation plans over the past two years and are anxious to get back on their favorite ships and try Oasis and the other new ships. But I still think the numbers will continue a decades long trend of cruisers getting older on average.
__________________
"Throw The Bottle!" |
|
#70
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
ALSEAU on the Constellation April 11, 2010 doing a 13 night Celebrity Transatlantic Eastbound cruise. Miami to Germany. Captain Wright Daily Log: Click herehttp://www.youtube.com/user/royalcaribbeanoasis Here is the InletCam URL: http://www.inletcam.com/ ALSEAU experiencing the awesome Oasis of the Seas 9/11/2010 Aaarrrr doing a B2B ALSEAU doesn't want to miss anything on the Oasis of the Seas 9/18/2010 Lifetime goal to sleep a year on the seas. Have enjoyed 203 evenings still have 162 nights to go. A trip of a thousand miles begins with a deposit! |
|
#71
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
"Throw The Bottle!" Catch! Actually, for those who are not having financial difficulties, this is exactly the right time to cruise. The pricing on expensive cruises is really good. As to the large ships, it is a strictly a matter of taste I guess. For a moment an analogy to aircraft carrier museums. Some have had stairs, elevators, restaurants and other major modifications. The USS Hornet, where I am a volunteer, is a National Historical Monument and as such 'may not be modified'. One, it must be maintained as it was in service, and two, it remains a 'ship', not a building that houses exhibits. In my view these megaships resemble floating buildings that house exhibits ... and an amusement park. I really love ships, and I don't much like amusement parks. That's my thing. After cruising Voyager class at least four times, and all of the others, our trend is to the smaller ships (see below). I don't see us returning to the 'big' ships until our physical capabilities and quest for adventure wains. Therefore, we will be among those who cause the average age on the big ships to increase, not decrease. And if I want to go to Central Park, I will fly to New York and also take in a real Broadway show.
__________________
Galapagos Xpedition Photos 9/6/2009 Cruise: (What do the people do?) Link to photo album.http://www.cig.usa.canon.com/a?i=InZKy3q3Do (Updated 11/20/09 - a few new) [click 'slideshow'] Kicker Rock at sunrise |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Sponsored Links |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|