BoardsCruise StylesDealsFeaturesFind a CruiseLuxuryNewsPlanningPortsReviews
HomeCruise Agencies | Cruise Deals
Go Back   Cruise Critic Message Boards > Cruise Discussion Topics > Ask a Cruise Question
 
Register here!
Forgot Your Password?



Notices

Ask a Cruise Question Post your general cruise questions here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 22nd, 2009, 04:15 PM
HattieCR HattieCR is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 44
Default Oasis of the Seas by Arthur Frommer

Check out this article written by Arthur Frommer about Oasis of the Seas.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...TL&type=travel
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old November 22nd, 2009, 05:18 PM
BroncosFan2010's Avatar
BroncosFan2010 BroncosFan2010 is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,948
Default

Thanks for posting this article. I find that he articulates my sentiments to a tee! I am not a fan of this ship and sincerely hope that smaller ships will be built in the future.
Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old November 22nd, 2009, 05:23 PM
H82seaUgo's Avatar
H82seaUgo H82seaUgo is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: M.S. EARTH
Posts: 439
Default

Very interesting.

Some like to vacation in NYC. Some like the country.
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old November 22nd, 2009, 06:13 PM
eandj eandj is offline
5,000+ Club
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,230
Default

This is his third article about the Oasis. And his sentiments are the same in them all.
Personally I wouldn't cruise her either. Seeing it on Entertainment Tonight on Friday made ME want to gag along with Arthur!
Reply With Quote

  #5  
Old November 22nd, 2009, 06:19 PM
Coolmama_1 Coolmama_1 is offline
Blue Ribbon Cruiser
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: TN
Posts: 3,302
Default

Thanks for sharing the article. Not sure I am ready for a 6000 pax ship either!
__________________
Judy
Golden Princess 7/04
Star Princess 1/06
Caribbean Princess 1/08

Next up:
Crown Princess 4/10
Reply With Quote

  #6  
Old November 22nd, 2009, 06:54 PM
Traveler353's Avatar
Traveler353 Traveler353 is online now
Blue Ribbon Cruiser
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Biloxi, Mississippi
Posts: 3,821
Default

Frommer can be brutialy honest in his reviews. Not saying so in this case but recently he has been letting his political views color some of his articles on land destinations. Overall I tend to agree with him on the Oasis. Just too big and I definetly do not like the atrium interior balcony cabins. If I want to go mountain climbing I go to the mountains and the ocean to go surfing (if I surfed). I have no plans of ever setting foot on that monster. I would certainly would not turn down a free cruise however on any ship.
__________________
"BE A TRAVELER NOT A TOURIST"
1841 DAYS AT SEA AND COUNTING
Reply With Quote

  #7  
Old November 22nd, 2009, 06:56 PM
PennyAgain PennyAgain is offline
Blue Ribbon Cruiser
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: west of DFW airport
Posts: 4,106
Default

Anyone remember the movie the Magic Christian? The Oasis doesn't need to leave the dock. The entertainment and food can just begin as she is tied up.

Last edited by PennyAgain; November 22nd, 2009 at 06:56 PM.
Reply With Quote

  #8  
Old November 22nd, 2009, 08:46 PM
pris993 pris993 is online now
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Mateo, California
Posts: 1,127
Default

We have been cruising for years, generally check out the new ships. We just finished a Eastern Mediterranean cruise on Equinox and did a TA on the Ruby. Both of these ships are as big as we want. Will not see us on the new RCCL ship.

I guess there is a place for it, especially for families with kids.

Too much activity for us, we enjoy having some peace and quiet on a cruise.
Reply With Quote

  #9  
Old November 22nd, 2009, 09:32 PM
room010 room010 is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Melbourne, 'Straya
Posts: 351
Default

I agree with every word of this article. I know we joke about just keeping a ship permanently docked so people can enjoy their resort, erm, I mean cruise without the inconvenience of actually travelling anywhere but I fear we are very close to it. Surely the whole point of going on a cruise is the actual enjoyment, pace and ambiance of living ON A SHIP for a few days? It will be very interesting to see how the average cruise fan will view Oasis once all the hooplah has died down. My guess is that there will be a backlash for a more "authentic" experience on a smaller, more personal, real ship rather than an extended stay on a floating shopping mall. I know where I plan to spend my dollars.

PS I just checked out the Oasis thread on the RCCL forum where someone DARED to suggest that Oasis may not be to everyones taste. Oh boy...
Reply With Quote

  #10  
Old November 22nd, 2009, 10:08 PM
HeavySurf's Avatar
HeavySurf HeavySurf is offline
5,000+ Club
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,356
Default

Frommer's specialty is budget travel. Why is he even discussing Oasis, whose current pricing hardly qualifies the ship as budget travel?

If he doesn't want to sail on a big ship, fine, but why does he have to insult the intelligence of those who do want to travel on Oasis? Or Carnival Dream? Or NCL Epic?

Frommer's disgust is palpable in recent articles he has written against big ships, but smaller ships are hardly disappearing. He still has plenty to choose from. And what a great time he will have on the small ship he chooses! All the families and stupid, depressed people he condemns will be on the big ships. So they will do him a big favor and he can sail with those oh, so intelligent passengers who are just like him.

In truth, I find the two columns he has written this week and last week somewhat deceptive. His description of Labadee as a barbed wire- fenced sandy beach clearly shows he has never even been to Labadee. Also I doubt he has ever been on Oasis.

His articles would be carry more weight if he actually sailed a big ship and saw what folks are doing. But I don't think he could make himself enjoy it because he has made up his mind about such ships and their passengers. I do feel he has lost objectivity and professionalism when he denigrates travelers who have travel preferences that do not agree with his.

By the way, I will be sailing Oasis in one week. I don't give a hoot what grouchy Frommer thinks about Oasis or folks like me.
__________________
* Diamond Plus Crown and Anchor



Last edited by HeavySurf; November 22nd, 2009 at 10:09 PM.
Reply With Quote

  #11  
Old November 22nd, 2009, 11:11 PM
chipmaster's Avatar
chipmaster chipmaster is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,444
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HattieCR View Post
Check out this article written by Arthur Frommer about Oasis of the Seas.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...TL&type=travel

I often wonder who is running the marketing, and here is an interesting example. If the ship is the destination then maybe this will fly.

For the family and I the ship is only 1/3 of the reason we cruise. Yeah we like the sit down meals, the pool, the shows. But lets be honest food is mediocre at best, unless you go to the speciality resturant, shows are similar, no better then what you can get in any medium sized town. Its all about the moving hotel, with benifits that allow you to visit a different port every day. The idea of trying to get off and on with 6,000+ others really sounds like no fun.

Its like a Las Vegas hotel, pack as much glitter and hope the crowds comes and spend lots of money and never leave. Dangle the real benifits but hope they all stay on the boat.

I've sailed on something as large as 3,000. But unless dismebarkation and embarkation change to 3 or 4 different gangways can't imagine it being fun anytime I'm trying to do the same thing as 6,000 of my friends; breakfast, dismebarkation, main show, pool, good god
__________________
Princess Emerald Princess Mediterranean 2008
Carnival Victory Caribbean 2005
Princess Ocean Princess Alaska 2000
Disney Magic Carribean 1999
Reply With Quote

  #12  
Old November 23rd, 2009, 12:13 AM
Ljberkow Ljberkow is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Easton, Massachusetts
Posts: 2,197
Default

Well, maybe he should give it a chance before slamming it. However, I agree with him with respect to his comment on the current itinerary. Three sea days and a day at the RCI private Bahamas island is not what I'm looking for. I don't mind big. I don't like congestion. So, I'm anxious to see real reviews and not just Frommer's blather.
Reply With Quote

  #13  
Old November 23rd, 2009, 01:19 AM
HinesL HinesL is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 129
Default

We like smaller ships but if people enjoy the bigger ones that is okay with me.
__________________

Reply With Quote

  #14  
Old November 23rd, 2009, 11:17 AM
Aquahound's Avatar
Aquahound Aquahound is offline
5,000+ Club
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The Conch Republic
Posts: 5,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HeavySurf View Post
By the way, I will be sailing Oasis in one week. I don't give a hoot what grouchy Frommer thinks about Oasis or folks like me.
I agree with you 100% and apparently, so do a lot of other people (the silent majority).

I just checked my Oct, 2010 booking again. With the exception of some Crown Loft Suites, all the suites and balconies are sold out. I have never seen a ship fill up this fast so far in advance.

Regardless of Frommer's thoughts, there is still a market for this ship.
__________________
Paul
Sunward II 10/90, Seaward 8/92, Seaward 9/95, Norwegian Sea 10/01, Monarch of the Seas 10/02, Enchantment of the Seas 10/03, Majesty of the Seas 5/04, Adventure of the Seas 10/04, Explorer of the Seas 10/05, Majesty of the Seas 5/06,Freedom of the Seas 9/06, Explorer of the Seas 5/07, Adventure of the Seas 10/07,Navigator of the Seas 2/08, Navigator of the Seas 8/08 (Mediterranean), Majesty of the Seas 11/08, Celebrity Solstice 4/09, Enchantment of the Seas 7/09, Radiance of the Seas 11/09
Reply With Quote

  #15  
Old November 23rd, 2009, 12:10 PM
cruzeluver cruzeluver is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,157
Default

While I don't care if others want to or plant to sail on the Oasis, it is simply not for me. That is just way too much "stuff" going on. Think I'll stick with the smaller, quieter ships.
__________________
Past/Upcoming Cruises:
Royal Caribbean-1981
Fair Sky-1985
Nordic Prince-1990
Norwegian Sea-2004
Celebration-2005
Norwegian Majesty-2006
Mariner of The Seas- Sep. 2007
Norwegian Star-April 2008
Carnival Glory-November 2008
Celebrity Constellation- April 2009
Carnival Spirit- August 2009
Celebrity Mercury-March 2010






Reply With Quote

  #16  
Old November 23rd, 2009, 01:06 PM
cruisemom42's Avatar
cruisemom42 cruisemom42 is online now
5,000+ Club
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,420
Default

While I don't have problems with a 6,000 passenger ship in theory, I'll reserve judgement until I see how well the crowds are really handled. I'd be most concerned about 1) the possibly limited number of ports where the ship can dock (I'd think tendering 6,000 people would be impossible....), and 2) how embarkation and disembarkation are planned. Could be a real mess!
__________________
Cynthia

Sitmar: 5 cruises
RCI: 1 cruise
NCL: 1 cruise
Celebrity: 1 cruise
HAL: 1 cruise
Princess: 5 cruises and counting

Next up: Ruby Princess Greek Isles June 10, 2010

"Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem." (In the good old days, children like you were left to perish on windswept crags.)
Reply With Quote

  #17  
Old November 23rd, 2009, 02:20 PM
BroncosFan2010's Avatar
BroncosFan2010 BroncosFan2010 is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,948
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by room010 View Post
I agree with every word of this article. I know we joke about just keeping a ship permanently docked so people can enjoy their resort, erm, I mean cruise without the inconvenience of actually travelling anywhere but I fear we are very close to it. Surely the whole point of going on a cruise is the actual enjoyment, pace and ambiance of living ON A SHIP for a few days? It will be very interesting to see how the average cruise fan will view Oasis once all the hooplah has died down. My guess is that there will be a backlash for a more "authentic" experience on a smaller, more personal, real ship rather than an extended stay on a floating shopping mall. I know where I plan to spend my dollars.

PS I just checked out the Oasis thread on the RCCL forum where someone DARED to suggest that Oasis may not be to everyones taste. Oh boy...

There are a lot of mixed feelings among RCCL cruisers about the Oasis. I am among those who think she is too big and does not sound like fun. We sure do get hammered for having an OPINION!
Reply With Quote

  #18  
Old November 23rd, 2009, 02:21 PM
BroncosFan2010's Avatar
BroncosFan2010 BroncosFan2010 is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,948
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HinesL View Post
We like smaller ships but if people enjoy the bigger ones that is okay with me.

My thoughts are that the bigger ships will keep the families and kids happy, and keep them off of the smaller ships. Makes my cruise more enjoyable!
Reply With Quote

  #19  
Old November 23rd, 2009, 03:23 PM
mr green's Avatar
mr green mr green is online now
Blue Ribbon Cruiser
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 3,150
Default

The ultimate judge on the Oasis will be the general public, whether or not she sails full, at a price that satisfies all concerned.
I for one will not be on her.

john
__________________
2010SEE THE WORLD. I do my best!

Homeric 1 Quebec 1955.
Windward Pacific Coastal 1996.
Song of America Mexico 1997.
NCL Wind Alaska 1998.
NCL Wind Caribbean 1999.
Westerdam [Ex Homeric 2] Alaska 2000 -- Norway E Caribbean Big Band 2000.
Sun Princess Panama Canal 2001---NCL Sun, Canada, New England 2001.
Dawn Princess Hawaii 2002.
Statendam Sea of Cortez and Pacific Coastal 2003.
Coral Princess Alaska and Coral Princess Alaska 2004.
Mercury Mexico 2005.--- Sea Princess Caribbean ---2005
Statendam Osaka Trans Pacific 19 day 2006.
Star Princess, British Isles and Trans Atlantic 2006.
Coral Princess Panama Canal 2007.
Zaandam, Hawaii, round trip from Vancouver 2008.
Coral Princess Sept 2009 Vancouver Whittier B/B
Next.
Coral Princess May 15th 2010 Vancouver Whittier B2B.
Reply With Quote

  #20  
Old November 23rd, 2009, 03:41 PM
aks368's Avatar
aks368 aks368 is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 871
Default

I can understand those who don't want to cruise on a ship that large or with that many people but for a professional to be so nasty about it is completely unnecessary.

Maybe I don't need my subscription to Budget Travel anymore.
Reply With Quote

Reply

Bookmarks


Sponsored Links
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:32 PM.


© 1995 - 2008, The Independent Traveler, Inc. All rights reserved.
"A Community of People Who Love To Cruise"
All of the information contained within Cruise Critic is protected by copyright. You may, however, download a single copy only for your personal use.