DOT proposes extending ADA to all passenger vessels (01/23/2007)Please consider reviewing these and sending in your comments. Every comment is reviewed...any is important.
Following up on a Supreme Court ruling in 2005, the Transportation Dept. has
formally proposed to issue a new package of regulations to extend the
Americans with Disabilities Act to passenger vessels, including
foreign-flagged cruise ships.
The proposals deal with the "policies and conditions relating to
transportation of passengers with disabilities" rather than with matters
involving vessel operations and physical or architectural barriers. Those
matters are being dealt with separately by the U.S. Access Board, a federal
agency devoted to accessible design issues.
For now, the DOT's proposal is confined to matters such as making sure that
reservations information is accessible to the blind and deaf and insuring
that vessel operators accept assistive devices (i.e., wheelchairs, walkers)
and service animals without question.
The rules would prohibit vessel operators from requiring disabled guests to
give advance notice, from limiting the number of disabled guests (there
would be exceptions for group bookings), from requiring the use of services
or assistance that the guest does not request. Terminal and transfer
facilities (i.e., shuttle bus transfer operations) are also covered.
The rules would cover all vessels, including cruise ships; ferries and
government-operated ferries such as the Alaska Marine Highway; river boats;
local dinner and sightseeing boats; fishing boats; and floating barges used
as dockside attractions and casinos. Foreign-flagged cruise ships are
specifically covered when the ship picks up passengers at ports in the U.S.,
its possessions, territories or commonwealths.
The applicability of the ADA to foreign-flagged ships was a bone of
contention in the industry for several years until the Supreme Court ruled
in 2005 that elements of the law can be applied to foreign-flag ships
serving U.S. ports without running afoul of international maritime treaties.
The DOT regulations would contain an escape clause under which an operator
of a foreign flag vessel could seek a waiver of any provision that conflicts
with a "binding legal requirement of a foreign nation."
In a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking issued in today's Federal Register, the
DOT asked for industry and public comment on the plan by April 23. Details
are online at http://dms.dot.gov. Refer to Docket 26829.
1986 HA Constitution: Hawaii 7 day
1988 NCL Skyward: Western Caribbean 7 day
1992 Crystal Harmony: Transcanal 15 day
1994 Golden Princess: Mexican Riviera 7 day
1995 HA Independence: Hawaii 7 day
1997 Celebrity Zenith: Transcanal 15 day
1999 Grand Princess: Mediterranian 14 day
2000 Regal Princess: Alaska Inside Passage 7 day
2000 Crystal Harmony: SF to Sydney 20 day
2001 HAL Ryndam: Cape Horn/SA 17 day
2003 HAL Statendam: Hawaii RT San Diego 15 day
2003 RCI Vision of the Seas: Mexican Riviera 7 day
2004 HAL Ryndam: Sea of Cortez 10 day
2004 Island Princess: Hawaii RT LA 15 day
2005 Island Princess: Hawaii RT LA 15 day
2006 Celebrity Mercury Mexican Riviera RT San Diego 10 day
2009 Sapphire Princess Mexican Riviera RT Los Angeles 7 day
2010 Sapphire Princess Mexican Riviera RT Los Angeles 7 day
2013 HAL Westerdam Alaska Inside Passage RT Seattle 7 day
2015 Hurtigruten Trollfjord RT Bergen 11 day
2017 AmaCerto Tulip Time-RT Amsterdam 7 day