Go Back   Cruise Critic Message Board Forums > Cruise Lines "A - O" > Holland America Line
 
Register here!
Forgot Your Password?


Notices

Holland America Line
Read thousands of Holland America Cruise Reviews from real cruisers and compare the best Holland America Cruise Deals

How to Organize a Cruise Critic Meet & Mingle (Meet & Greet) on Board Your Holland America Cruise

NEW! Find Your HOLLAND AMERICA Roll Call

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 28th, 2010, 08:27 AM
gwilli gwilli is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 471
Question Alaska vs Norwegian Fjords

Alaska vs Norwegian Fjords -- what are the pros and cons of each? We can't decide which way to go!
__________________
gwilli
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old November 28th, 2010, 08:59 AM
CtheW0rld CtheW0rld is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,132
Default

i haven't been to alaska, but here are some photos of my visit to geirangerfjord in norway: http://family.webshots.com/album/560861663BoHOQP

Last edited by CtheW0rld; November 28th, 2010 at 09:01 AM.
Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old November 28th, 2010, 09:22 AM
Mary Ellen Mary Ellen is offline
5,000+ Club
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Colorado
Posts: 7,171
Default

We've been to both, more than once. Both locations are wonderful!!! If you want to see glaciers, Alaska is your choice - unless your cruise is heading to the FAR north part of Norway (i.e. Spitsbergen). The fjords of Norway are lush and green, with a more 'intimate' feeling. Alaska has mountains with ice and snow. We couldn't pick one over the other.
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old November 28th, 2010, 09:32 AM
esther e's Avatar
esther e esther e is offline
5,000+ Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,298
Default

We have also been both places, more to Norway though. If I had a decision to make between the two, I would choose Norway without a moment's hesitation. I love the fjords and the whole country! Now you've got me thinking...........
Reply With Quote

  #5  
Old November 28th, 2010, 09:46 AM
fann1sh's Avatar
fann1sh fann1sh is offline
Blue Ribbon Cruiser
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Michigan/Ontario border
Posts: 4,178
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by esther e View Post
I love the fjords and the whole country! Now you've got me thinking...........
Esther E, your comment made me think of a fact some CC'ers may not know. Norway consistently tops the UN's "best countries in which to live" list, far ahead of the U.S. and Canada. I need to visit to discover more myself.

(BTW, I subscribed to this thread before I posted, because I find this topic so interesting.)
__________________
----Patricia
Reply With Quote

Ad Sponsored By
  #6  
Old November 28th, 2010, 09:56 AM
uppitycats uppitycats is offline
5,000+ Club
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,140
Default

I've been to Alaska 3 times, Norway once, and we're going to Norway again next April.

The only "con" to Norway is the distance you have to travel to get there.

They're both lovely...and quite different. Norway is "up close and personal" -- you see the mountains right outside your window, close enough to feel like you can touch them. If you travel up and through the fjords, you'll see homes, farms, orchards, beautiful small towns all through them.

Alaska is vast..wide open spaces. Distance is deceptive. You'll see a tiny "dot" out on the horizon, miles and miles away, and be told it's an elk, or moose. You'll see a glacier and not have a sense of just how huge it is..until you notice the tiny kayak with two people in it, up along side the glacier..and it looks like a child's toy.

Norway is less crowded with tourists than Alaska..at least when we were there this April. There isn't the mad rush to town, swamped with thousands of others just off their ships, but a more muted tourist experience.

We love both, but right now are leaning towards Norawy..probably because we're planning our cruise.. but I really can't think of any "cons" to either trip..except the distance..
__________________
I've cruised on Princess, Carnival, HAL,
NCL, Hurtigruten and a couple of even smaller lines in the past. HAL is (for now) my favorite!

Reply With Quote

  #7  
Old November 28th, 2010, 10:21 AM
ab0si ab0si is offline
Blue Ribbon Cruiser
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,026
Default

Alaska Pluses:
Wildlife
Glaciers (most Norwegian cruises don't go to the glaciers there)

Alaska minuses: can be crowded
very little "culture" in port stops

Norwegian Pluses:
Seldom crowded
Best Fjords (others are Chile and New Zealand)
Lots of history (Oslo and Bergen)

Norwegian minuses:
Norway is very expensive .. cup of coffee is >$5 US .. no refills
Reply With Quote

  #8  
Old November 28th, 2010, 10:28 AM
Druke I Druke I is offline
10,000+ Club
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Lincoln CA USA, 95648
Posts: 12,740
Default

ab0si sums it up very well, IMO.

Solve your own problem - do both, in different years if need be.
__________________
Michael
Reply With Quote

  #9  
Old November 28th, 2010, 10:39 AM
0bnxshs's Avatar
0bnxshs 0bnxshs is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,733
Default

Why choose? Do both if you can. They are as different as your imagination allows, and as similar as any shared experience can be. "Culture", as mentioned above, is very subjective; Alaska coastal towns are rich with the cultural heritage of migratory peoples dating back longer than recorded history, even ice ages. Norway as well has a wonderful and rich heritage of peoples who've long known the clockworks of winter and summer, the ebb and flow of wind and sea.

Don't choose, if you can help it; do both! And remember, there are fjordlands in New Zealand, Chile and Argentina, Russia, Canada, and other places as well.
__________________
Regards, Rich
www.HALfacts.com for HAL facts.
Sailaway Gangs' Apr 2015 Westerdam Panama Canal Cruise Roll Call Spreadsheet

ms Maasdam - S Caribbean - Mar/Apr 14
Ruby Princess - W Caribbean - Dec 13
ms Westerdam - E Caribbean Thanksgiving - Nov 13
Golden Princess - Inside Passage w/Tracy Arm - Sep 13
Carnival Ecstasy - Bahamas "Thank You" Cruise - Jun 13
ms Prinsendam - T/A and Baltic Collector's Cruise - May/Jun 13
ms Ryndam - W Caribbean New Year's - Dec 12/Jan 13
Ocean Princess - Land of the Midnight Sun - Jun/Jul 12
Celebrity Infinity - Panama Canal and S America - Dec 11
Norwegian Sun - TA Copenhagen to Port Canaveral - Sep/Oct 11
ms Veendam - South America & Antarctica Holiday - Dec 10/Jan 11
Sun Princess - New Zealand R/T Sydney - Nov/Dec 09
ms Statendam - Glacier Bay Discovery - Jun 09
ms Amsterdam - Alaskan Explorer - May 08
USS Pennsylvania (SSBN-735) - Tiger Cruise - Nov 97
USS John C Calhoun (SSBN-630) - Tiger Cruise - 1995
USS Stonewall Jackson (SSBN-634) - Tiger Cruise - 1969

Last edited by 0bnxshs; November 28th, 2010 at 10:45 AM.
Reply With Quote

  #10  
Old November 28th, 2010, 03:21 PM
canadarocks canadarocks is offline
Blue Ribbon Cruiser
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario
Posts: 3,834
Default

We sailed for 14 days on the Ryndam in Alaska in 2009 and I absolutely LOVED it. Onboard we met others who said "if you like Alaska, you'll LOVE Norway!".

In July 2011 we're doing a 22 day B2B on the Eurodam that takes us to 10 countries, Norway included. So we'll get to find out which we prefer!
Reply With Quote

  #11  
Old November 28th, 2010, 04:28 PM
RuthC's Avatar
RuthC RuthC is offline
30,000+ Club
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Warwick, R.I. , USA
Posts: 32,275
Smile

I've been to Alaska 5 times, and Norway about twice that number.
They are both similar in that there are mountains coming from the sea, and that it can be cool/cold and rainy, or warm/hot and sunny. There's no predicting. The sense of being enclosed by the mountains is more pronounced in Norway.

I very much agree with ab0si's list of pros and cons. Travel to either is brutal from the US east coast, and for each you will need to arrive at least one day before your cruise.

You can't go wrong with either choice.
__________________
Try www.halfacts.com for info on HAL

I'd give up chocolate, but I'm no quitter.
Reply With Quote

  #12  
Old November 28th, 2010, 04:38 PM
DeepWaterMariner's Avatar
DeepWaterMariner DeepWaterMariner is offline
Blue Ribbon Cruiser
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,084
Default

We like them both too. There is definetly more wildlife in Alaska, including a far greater chance of seeing whales as well as something more exotic like a bear. I think Norway has the edge on scenery and you can have a true midnight sun experience since they go above the Arctic Circle.
__________________
DeepWaterMariner

Cruising since 1968
Reply With Quote

  #13  
Old November 28th, 2010, 05:16 PM
Lizzie1213 Lizzie1213 is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 300
Default

I have never been to Alaska, but I liked Norway very much. the fjords were beautiful. Also, Bergen was a very interesting Medieval city.
Reply With Quote

  #14  
Old November 28th, 2010, 05:42 PM
jiminyC_fan jiminyC_fan is offline
Cool Cruiser
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Littleton, CO
Posts: 450
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by uppitycats View Post
I've been to Alaska 3 times, Norway once, and we're going to Norway again next April.

The only "con" to Norway is the distance you have to travel to get there.

They're both lovely...and quite different. Norway is "up close and personal" -- you see the mountains right outside your window, close enough to feel like you can touch them. If you travel up and through the fjords, you'll see homes, farms, orchards, beautiful small towns all through them.

Alaska is vast..wide open spaces. Distance is deceptive. You'll see a tiny "dot" out on the horizon, miles and miles away, and be told it's an elk, or moose. You'll see a glacier and not have a sense of just how huge it is..until you notice the tiny kayak with two people in it, up along side the glacier..and it looks like a child's toy.

Norway is less crowded with tourists than Alaska..at least when we were there this April. There isn't the mad rush to town, swamped with thousands of others just off their ships, but a more muted tourist experience.

We love both, but right now are leaning towards Norawy..probably because we're planning our cruise.. but I really can't think of any "cons" to either trip..except the distance..
Beautiful description. Now I want to go.

I am a 50% Norwegian and would love to go there someday. Do you all go by HAL?
Reply With Quote

Reply

Bookmarks


Ad Sponsored By
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:33 AM.


© 1995 - 2014, The Independent Traveler, Inc. All rights reserved.
"A Community of People Who Love To Cruise"
All of the information contained within Cruise Critic is protected by copyright. You may, however, download a single copy only for your personal use.