Posted August 24th, 2011, 02:36 PM
Last edited by FreshOffTheBoat; August 24th, 2011 at 02:40 PM
It is NOT RC's fault for leaving early. The article states that port officials had begun limiting harbor traffic earlier in the day..as in THE SAME DAY...Although I agree they could have handled it better, there was no way to let them know "a day in advance" as you indicate....
Its called planning AHEAD. They KNEW a hurricane was coming up the coast. It can't be the first time a hurricane was close to a port and a port had to be closed early. They should know to predict these things as a company, and at the very least if their is potential that they have to leave early to let their customer know of the possibility.
IT'S NOT THE passengers fault, so people who try to blame them stop. Some of you guys protect the company way to much, get real.
All I am saying is I am VERY disapointing on how RCI is treating the people who were stranded, by basically saying its not their fault and their not going to compensate. They should of flown all 145 people to Aruba not just 15.
1st Cruise: Serenade of the Seas - Alaska (7 nts.) - Sept. 2009
2nd Cruise: Monarch of the Seas - Bahamas (3 nts.) - Feb. 2010
3rd Cruise: Serenade of the Seas - Southern Caribbean (7 nts.) - July 2010
4th Cruise: Explorer of the Seas - Canada/ New England (9 nts.) - Oct. 2010
5th Cruise: Freedom of the Seas - Western Caribbean (7 nts.) - Jan. 2011
6th Cruise: Mariner of the Seas - Mediterranean Holy Land (13 nts.) - Sept. 2011
7th Cruise: Rhapsody of the Seas - Hawaii (11 nts.) - Sept. 2012
8th Cruise: Enchantment of the Seas - Bahamas (4 nts.) - Jan. 2015
9th Cruise: Grandeur of the Seas - Bahamas (7 nts.) - Aug. 2015
Coming up January 2017 - Oasis of the Seas back to back
Love to Travel! Love Royal Caribbean