Jump to content
Cruise Critic Community

K.S.

Members
  • Content Count

    41
  • Joined

About K.S.

  • Rank
    Cool Cruiser

About Me

  • Location
    New York City
  • Interests
    Cinema, French Culture, Romance Languages, Ships, Trains, Travel, Cuisine
  • Favorite Cruise Line(s)
    Cunard, Compagnie du Ponant
  • Favorite Cruise Destination Or Port of Call
    Transatlantic
  • If you have a personal or hobby CRUISE or TRAVEL BLOG, include the url here:
    Instagram: @latlantique

Recent Profile Visitors

129 profile views
  1. Carnival is both a blessing and a curse. Yes, without Carnival money, QM2 wouldn’t have been built etc., and all are happy about that. But it doesn’t give Carnival a free lifetime pass, either.
  2. Briefly chatted via text with the acquaintance who disembarked from QM2 this morning. I asked him how the filming went. Dining scenes were shot in the Queens Grill. I asked him if areas of the ship had been closed off to passengers. His short response: “They sure did, and it was annoying”. He said a lot of the bars were closed off at one time or another: Commodore Club, Chart Room, Sir Samuels. Also portions “of the deck” by which he meant Boat Deck (“Promenade Deck”). That was his response.
  3. I think they are an eyesore. I think they are disgusting. Opinions.
  4. Okay. Doesn’t change my opinion on sales tables. Doesn’t change your apparent opinion on slot machines. That’s all anyone is doing here. Stating their opinions.
  5. Slot machines certainly aren’t as tacky as sales tables. And they aren’t out in the halls. That’s my opinion. And what about the table with the spread of M&M’s and Pringles? That’s ultra tacky too. In my opinion.
  6. I don’t have a problem with a casino. It’s another public room. Although, I don’t like that it’s not fully enclosed.
  7. I’m going on what another poster has reported. EDIT: Going back, I see this was reported on QE. So, yes, the shops are there. But it doesn’t change my opinion on sales tables in general. I don’t like them, I think they are really tacky. What’s wrong with that?
  8. Even if you don’t patronize them, they are still an eyesore. On *any* line. That’s my opinion.
  9. Or “Pirates” that come through the dining room to hold fake knives to your neck, so a company photographer can snap a photo and try to sell you a copy later. Good grief, I had forgotten about that!
  10. They may have been there for years. That doesn’t mean they are appropriate. And at the very least, not outside the Queens Room.
  11. I thought what I was conveying was getting across, but it’s obvious that it hasn’t, so let me clarify. I do not have a problem with the food on Princess. I’ve not said that Cunard are not surpassed. I have a problem with the interior design and decor, and the things they do, and feel that not just of Princess, but of other mass market cruise lines in general: Holland America, NCL, *Carnival*, Royal Caribbean etc. Another member here posted that Mac & Cheese was an “abomination”. I stated that I love a good gourmet Mac & Cheese and have prepared a really good version at home. However, I just don’t believe Mac & Cheese (or burgers) belong on the dinner menu. Lunch, yes. Dinner, no. If I ran the restaurants, they wouldn’t be (on the dinner menu). It’s just a matter of personal style. I also have not criticized the menu of the Verandah. Do I think a burger should be on the dinner menu? No. Do I have a problem with the rest? No. It’s a *grill*. Steaks and chops are what *should* be on the menu. In fact, the original Verandah restaurant on the 1936 QUEEN MARY, was the “Verandah Grill”. On the NORMANDIE, the extra tariff restaurant was simply known as the “Grill Room”. That’s what those restaurants were. So the “Steakhouse at the Verandah” is, no matter what they call it, a Grill. And the current menu is as it should be. I have no problem with it. I never said I did. As far as the mention of “B.B. King” or “Rolling Stone”, those are venues found on Holland America ships (this was discussed earlier in the thread, before I commented). I was criticizing, once again, mass market cruise lines in general, not just Princess. Don’t get me started on NCL or Carnival (and then there is the terrible, ugly design and silhouette of “ships” these days. Sorry, but the “Royal Class” design externally is just hideous. I mean, it’s just a floating apartment block. Come on!) What I *am* saying is that Cunard has an image, style and tradition to uphold. It appeals to a certain customer, a certain audience. They need to maintain that. The dress codes, the menu selections, the interior design, all of it. Tacky tchotchke tables outside the Queens Room is a big, hard NO. Not appropriate for Cunard (and really, in my opinion, not appropriate anywhere (except maybe NCL and Carnival. It’s not like they are the epitome of class and style to begin with). By the way. It’s not really Art Deco and Victorian. Some of the decorative touches you are referring to as “Victorian” are actually more *Edwardian*, if you want to go there. They echo more the style of MAURETANIA, AQUITANIA, or LUSITANIA, or the White Star Line ships OLYMPIC, BRITANNIC, etc. Queen Victoria died January, 1901. Cunard isn’t going back to the style of late 19th century ships. Also, Art Deco doesn’t equate to “Cunard” ship design. What it *does* equate to is the design prevalent at the apex of the age of the great ocean liners, the 1930’s, and *that* is what people want to be able to experience: that bygone era of style, beauty and grace of the original QM, NORMANDIE, ILE DE FRANCE, etc. Like I said I do like the design of the new Britannia Club on QV. But it’s really not that “contemporary”. Make no mistake. It’s still very much a Deco inspired design (except for the chandeliers). There is one line that used to have really great contemporary interior design: Celebrity. I’m talking back when the Celebrity SUMMIT and her three sisters were sailing. Those ships had contemporary interior design and yet, still felt, somehow like “modern classic” (the squared off, container ship rear ends externally, were another matter). A contemporary take on classic. Elegant. Stylish. Sadly they’ve now lost their way and given themselves over to gigantism (ECLIPSE ships I’m looking at you. And SOLSTICE et al.) and ugly interiors too. Part of the problem with mass market cruise ships today, is that they are well, “mass market”. That means appealing to the lowest common denominator. You get all kinds of passengers on cruises these days. *All kinds*. Also, another problem (as someone else put it either here or elsewhere, I can’t remember) is that they really aren’t run by shipping lines. They are run by what are essentially *entertainment travel companies*. Hence the Royal Caribbean monstrosities, and others. That, however, is for another discussion.
  12. But Princess IS tacky (not as much as others, but still). Let’s face it. Modern mass-market cruise ships are super tack fests. All chrome and branded venues like “B.B. King” and “Rolling Stone”, for example. And don’t get me started on Royal Caribbean, those aren’t even ships (and I dare say, unsafe). P.S. The Verandah on QM2 is now a grill, so a burger makes sense. Is it available at dinner though? Or just lunch?
×
×
  • Create New...