Jump to content

Decisions, decisions....wait for a camera update or buy a phone?


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Sony hates me. Maybe they don't actually hate me, but they have little regard for my personal finances.

 

They just got done hitting me with the A1 super-camera when the rumor mill started dangling specs for the A7IV later this year. Now, in a brazen attempt to decimate my tech budget, they announced the Xperia 1 III phone. The camera specs read like an Alpha mirrorless camera or maybe a high-end Cybershot rather than a phone and include things like real-time tracking AF, real-time Eye-AF, a 12MP three camera array featuring 16mm-f/2.2, 24mm-f/1.7 and 70-105mm -f/2.3-2.8 (optical zoom) lenses and 20 frame/sec burst rate that combines 4 exposures for each frame to reduce noise. It has a bunch of audio wizardry that doesn't really affect me but what it does have is dual-sim card tech that may make it compatible with our Google Fi service. 

 

At this time, without pricing being available, I intend to wait for the A7IV announcement before I decide whether to upgrade phone or camera (or both 😮) and will probably wait for the Pixel 6 specs to come out this fall to see what their return to flagship phones will bring.

 

It seems odd to consider spending $1000(ish) for a phone but I used to carry a $400 phone and a $500 compact camera which when combined, wouldn't hold a candle to this package. Times change. Tech changes nearly as fast.

 

A cornucopia of choice! It's a great time to be a photographer!

 

Link: Xperia 1 III | Android Smartphone | 4K HDR OLED 120Hz Display | Sony US

 

Dave  

Edited by pierces
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I don't see any cellphone rendering tremendous photos compared to even a P&S camera. I know they take photos good enough for whatever social media someone wants to post to, but none of them will be good enough for prints of a decent size. Simply put, then sensor is just too small to start with and much of the detail is software driven.

 

But I get you with the cost of new camera bodies. It is part of the reason I just jumped from Sony. The cost of lenses is far too high and the cameras are insanely priced as well. The only good thing is that they hold up value. I just sold my a6400 after a little more than a year for $50 more than I paid for it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
22 hours ago, BoozinCroozin said:

I don't see any cellphone rendering tremendous photos compared to even a P&S camera. I know they take photos good enough for whatever social media someone wants to post to, but none of them will be good enough for prints of a decent size. Simply put, then sensor is just too small to start with and much of the detail is software driven.

But I get you with the cost of new camera bodies. It is part of the reason I just jumped from Sony. The cost of lenses is far too high and the cameras are insanely priced as well. The only good thing is that they hold up value. I just sold my a6400 after a little more than a year for $50 more than I paid for it.

 

Sort of how I viewed phones until I picked up a Nokia Icon Windows phone a few years ago. Its main selling point was the camera and it was honestly good enough to delay and finally cancel my next purchase of a daily-carry compact camera. Since then I have moved to the Pixel phones and the magic they perform with the remarkable 12MP Sony sensors and computational processing is a game-changer. I rarely print anymore but have a couple of 16x20s from images captured on a phone and nobody has yet jumped back and said, "Ewwwww...phone picture!" 🙂 They also look great for my current display preference which is 4K slide shows and screensaver sets on my TV and computer screen. I still love my camera and carry it often, but I always have my phone with me. 

 

As for the cost of bodies and lenses, the pro-level lenses have always been pricey and it's not really any worse now if you adjust for inflation and the quality has never been better. Even the lower-tier lenses are so much better than their ancestors that the prices are actually reasonable. The bodies are another matter (except for the pro stuff which has always been pricey). Since the phones have all but killed the sub-$800 market, $1500-$2000 is now the new normal for high-end APS-C or entry level full-frame. What is missing from the comparison is that the good APS-C cameras and the "entry-level" full-frame units are as far beyond their predecessors of a decade ago in terms of capabilities and performance as an iPhone 12 or new top-end Samsung is when compared to a smartphone from the same period. I'm not pleased with shelling out a couple of thousand dollars for a new camera body but the pain is softened a little by considering what it is that I am paying for. SO, yes the body prices are high, but at least you get what you pay for.

 

Same with a phone. I haven't replaced my laptop as an alternate to my desktop for ten years or so since virtually all the functions I need when not at my desk are available on increasingly capable phones. Stuff a kick-butt camera into my phone and the $750-$1000 price tag can be rationalized (grudgingly) against the cost of a laptop, phone and compact camera. I'm not someone who always needs the newest shiny thing as soon as it hits the store and I will use tech like my A6300 for years after its replacements have been available if it still does what I want it to. Then again, if something pops up that is so far ahead of what I have that it will allow me to do something (that I want to do) that my current device can't, it will get my attention (within reason, as illustrated by my new Lotto-winner camera that I don't own, the Alpha1).

 

After buying gas this weekend and looking at beef and plywood prices, I have a much softer reaction to the price of photography equipment!

 

 

Dave

Edited by pierces
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get you. I am not a pixel peeper and don't edit photos too often. However, I can tell an insane difference between a picture from a phone and a picture from a camera, even P&S cameras. A phone is great for all the social media and online stuff. Anything printed, I can tell the difference almost immediately.

 

You are 100% correct though. Most people will not care or even notice it. That tends to your statement about just using a phone for all your pictures. It works to an extent and for a majority it won't matter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BoozinCroozin said:

I get you. I am not a pixel peeper and don't edit photos too often. However, I can tell an insane difference between a picture from a phone and a picture from a camera, even P&S cameras. A phone is great for all the social media and online stuff. Anything printed, I can tell the difference almost immediately.

 

It truly depends on the phone and to some extent, the photographer. A good friend has a fairly good Motorola with a 16MP camera and the difference in quality between it and My Pixel4 is much like what you describe above. Within the limits of the lens and light availability, the Pixel produces images with quality superior to any of the fairly advanced P&S cameras I have owned. Same with the latest Samsung flagships or iPhones. Not all phone cameras are created equal, which is why I have a good one and no longer use a compact camera. The photographer factor is twofold. Knowing how to use the phone (or any camera) with respect to its strengths and weaknesses and properly composing a picture to take advantage of the strengths and minimizing the weaknesses still holds true. As I said, I love to use the "real" camera because the possibilities afforded by good lenses and the incredibly forgiving ISO range of the A7III allows for shots the phone just isn't suited for or even capable of. Phone tech, however, has evolved to the point that I no longer feel like I was lazy and scrimping on quality by not bringing along the "real camera" when I'm out and about and instead using the phone within its known limits.

 

A7III 1/64s at 105mm - well beyond the limits of my phone.

1396870548_2021-04TheWatcher.thumb.jpg.f5a99f0647fd377b89c41f10e64a82bc.jpg

 

Oh, crap...a Santa convention. Pixel 4 at 24mm equivalent.

201663643_2020-46FirstThingsFirst.thumb.jpg.4e351a2cb06a388fd4dc6befa198c22e.jpg

 

Smoked Bourbon. Pixel 4 1/15s - f/1.7 - ISO 1642

00100lrPORTRAIT_00100_BURST20200916172632796_COVER.thumb.jpg.41f61543de09b7aa59df0c4774df07d5.jpg

 

Anybody's guess...hazy beach city.

728559763_2020-4725DegreesWestofSummer.thumb.jpg.b9db3c4e90a56085d7cf69ed465933a2.jpg

 

Slick plane in a fairly dim garage.

1324700258_2020-32RunoftheMill.thumb.jpg.5d1b838b3bd93b4c0fabc3799488a9fa.jpg

 

Needless to say, the compression and reduction inflicted by the forum is no picture's friend but at 1:1 on my 4k monitor, the source of any of these photos can't be easily identified and all would print up to 16x20 without worry. 24x36...worry might increase a bit.

 

Dave

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Starting to look like a $1200 phone.

 

I hope one of the new features makes it able to photograph tomorrow's winning lottery numbers today.

 

It will now have to be spectacular. To be fair, it already sounds spectacular. So, spectacular-er?

 

New Sony APS-C camera due in a couple of weeks. A7IV maybe later this year. Pixel 6, October-ish.

 

'Twill be an interesting year.

 

 

Dave

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Now Google hates me...

 

Rumors, both confirmed and unconfirmed are pointing to Google's return to putting out a flagship phone later this year. The Pixel 6 Pro looks like it will feature a three camera solution with a long optical zoom. Tack on their fantastical AI processing and it may just be time for me to upgrade. 

 

The debate as to whether a phone can take the place of a "real" camera will continue much like the RAW vs. JPEG war of words has long after there isn't really any objective difference in the results. My current phone already outperforms any P&S I have ever owned except for zoom range. Since my shooting tends towards the wide end for day to day snaps or on a walkabout, the phone is a great solution for me.

 

Would I take my phone to shoot the grandkids at a hockey game or doing a figure skating routine? No. Would it be my primary camera in Alaska? No. Do I take my A7III out to dinner to snap food and family? Also no. That's why I have always said that the best all-around camera for every situation is two or even three cameras!

 

Happy shooting! With, whatever....

 

 

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well, the Xperia phone won't be a $1200 phone after all.

 

It's $1300. 

 

Awesome specs, but...

 

Waiting for Pixel 6 Pro news.

 

 

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/2/2021 at 2:37 PM, Tahitianbigkahuna said:

Never been hired to shoot a wedding because I have the best cell phone 😉

I use 4 different manufactures of cameras during a wedding  ... not one of them is my cell phone.

 

 

I have to admit, I've never used my phone when shooting a wedding, but I also never carry my cameras to Home Depot when picking up some lumber (see the Santa Army above). A modern phone is more than capable of capturing a quality image of something that catches my eye when I'm not armed with the "real" camera. I can't even imagine how many impromptu moments didn't get made into revisitable memories before I had a decent camera in my phone. 

 

Dockside margarita flight in Cozumel. No tour, travelling light.

image.thumb.png.53d2dbf3873c7e75b17131adb3072aab.png

 

Nap time is over!

image.thumb.png.3fee883c6b392e9a05ed5834ebca02c5.png

 

A phone will never replace my cameras but I will always base my future phone purchases on it having a great camera.

 

Dave 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Solid leak on Pixel 6, phone specs. No hint of pricing but if the leaked specs are right, it looks like cheap is unlikely and the Pro version will likely be up there with the Xperia. As mentioned before, the price is offset a bit by combining the functions of a advanced compact camera, tablet and even a laptop for some applications into a smartphone-sized package, but still...

 

Pixel 6:

• 6.4-inch Samsung-made AMOLED screen
• 8GB RAM
• 128GB/256GB storage
• 8MP front cam
• 50MP (primary) and 12MP (ultra-wide) rear cams
• 4,614 mAh battery


Pixel 6 Pro:

• 6.71-inch LG-made pOLED screen
• 12GB RAM
• 128GB/256GB/512GB storage
• 12MP front cam
• 50MP (primary), 48MP (telephoto), and a 12MP (ultra-wide) rear cams
• 5,000 mAh battery


Both will have a custom Google chipset with support for Wi-Fi 6e and 5G connectivity.

 

It will be at least a couple of months before an official announcement, so I'll keep putting my change into the Mason jar and hope Sony doesn't release an A7IV that can make phone calls.

 

 

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Forum Jump
    • Categories
      • Thank You for 25 Years - Click for Fun Stuff!
      • Forum Assistance
      • New Cruisers
      • Cruise Lines “A – O”
      • Cruise Lines “P – Z”
      • River Cruising
      • ROLL CALLS
      • Digital Photography & Cruise Technology
      • Special Interest Cruising
      • Cruise Discussion Topics
      • UK Cruising
      • Australia & New Zealand Cruisers
      • Canadian Cruisers
      • North American Homeports
      • Ports of Call
      • Cruise Conversations
×
×
  • Create New...