Jump to content

Itinerary question about Chilean fjords


grayjay

Recommended Posts

I'm trying to decide the question whether "Infinity" (we're already booked on the leg from Valparaiso to Miami) or HAL's "Zaandam" will offer more scenic cruising in the Chilean fjords on the cruise from Buenos Aires to Valparaiso.

Celebrity plainly just states two sea days there and the drawing shows them partly outside in the Pacific, whereas "Zaandam" specifically mentions a passage through the Beagle Canal, Glacier Alley, Canal Sarmiento and Amalia Glacier and thus seems to pass more on the inside.

Marketing spiel or true??

I'd be happy to get answers from CC members who have sailed on "Infinity" ( or Princess - they offer a similar itinerary) to solve that question, as we'd definitely prefer more cruising in Patagonia as compared to the ports in Argentina.

I'll also post this on the South America board, but as it's rather quiet I'm hoping for more answers here.

Thank you all!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Forum Jump
    • Categories
      • Welcome to Cruise Critic
      • New Cruisers
      • Cruise Lines “A – O”
      • Cruise Lines “P – Z”
      • River Cruising
      • ROLL CALLS
      • Cruise Critic News & Features
      • Digital Photography & Cruise Technology
      • Special Interest Cruising
      • Cruise Discussion Topics
      • UK Cruising
      • Australia & New Zealand Cruisers
      • Canadian Cruisers
      • North American Homeports
      • Ports of Call
      • Cruise Conversations
×
×
  • Create New...