UME6869 Posted April 14, 2009 #1 Share Posted April 14, 2009 Anyone seen the latest review for the Victory? It says "fire not a concern on the triumph" Then it goes on about an unfortunet situation and at the end they say they will never sail the Victory again. Am I missing something here? Was it the Victory or Triumph? If it was the triumph, why was it posted under Victory reviews. If it was the Victory why do they mention the Triumph. I'm Confused Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KEITJE Posted April 14, 2009 #2 Share Posted April 14, 2009 am confused as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlaKrznNubie Posted April 14, 2009 #3 Share Posted April 14, 2009 Anyone seen the latest review for the Victory? It says "fire not a concern on the triumph" Then it goes on about an unfortunet situation and at the end they say they will never sail the Victory again. Am I missing something here? Was it the Victory or Triumph? If it was the triumph, why was it posted under Victory reviews. If it was the Victory why do they mention the Triumph. I'm Confused Post a link to the review and perhaps we can help you... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UME6869 Posted April 14, 2009 Author #4 Share Posted April 14, 2009 Not sure how to post link, I'm not that computer litterate,sorry. Go to Reviews,ckick on members reviews, pick carnival Victory and you will see it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grand Kman Posted April 14, 2009 #5 Share Posted April 14, 2009 It looks like they were talking about the Victory since there was a statement made about boarding in Barbados. I don't think they do that on the Triumph. Looks like the TV shorted out and smoked his cabin up a bit. He called the operator and housekeeping and the ship electrician showed up. That looks proper. I think his main complaint was that they wouldn't exchange his room because the ship was full. I guess he felt that even though the room wasn't up to his standards, it would be fine to stick another guest in. The rest of his experience was predictable. Food was bad, shows were bad, blah, blah, blah. Actually gave the shore excursions a 4, then never mentioned 1 single port in his review. How can you go to 6 ports of call in seven days and not even mention any of them in a review? :confused: Amazing!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxamuus Posted April 19, 2009 #6 Share Posted April 19, 2009 I don't know about you but i smell a troll review. Is it even possible to sail on a ship for a week and not know the name of the ship? Either way i would give the review ZERO credence cause the person is either a troll or a moron. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.