RPen63

I have had a similar experience to the OP’s while I was on O. I was in a specialty restaurant, probably Polo, but I don’t remember for sure. After checking out the dessert menu and finding nothing that I felt was worth the calories, I asked if they had berries available. The waiter said that they did not in that restaurant but told me that he would get me some from elsewhere on the ship, which he did. I’m not sure that the end result was any different between our experiences.

If time was not an issue, I would suggest adding at least 1 more day to each city. Aside from that, Bratislava is a beautiful little city and it is worth spending a day there as well. It can be reached by fast ferry from Vienna along the Danube.

Sirena had a lecturer during the crossing we were on in January. Her lectures were essentially a summary of The Path Between the Seas, and in my opinion missed the best bits. That being said, she was an entertaining speaker and her lectures provided excellent information to those who hadn’t read the book. She also provided a narrative through the crossing but was difficult to hear if not close to a speaker.

We have stayed there twice 9as recently as January this year) and enjoyed it.

It would be worth looking into an umbrella insurance policy. Some cover all rental-car-related risks and could be a cost effective solution especially when the other benefits are considered. Ask your home and/or car insurance provider about the benefits and costs.

In my experience, O doesn’t link excursions with credits. The first ones bought are paid for with the SM credit. The first one(s) cancelled are deemed to be paid by credit card or other credits. O cancelled the first excursion we selected, and which had been covered by our SM credit, but refunded its value up to the amount we had paid for excursions via our credit card. The balance went back into our SM excursion credit. Cancellations while onboard may be handled differently. The credit card payment was refunded in a few days.

Reasonable conclusion based on my experience, however be happy if you are advised of the change in some fashion other than noticing a new arrival / departure times in the Currents the night before!

+1

If it helps, I typed my review up in a word processor and then cut and pasted it into the review. It was reasonably painless, but would be a pain (at least for me) on my phone or iPad.

Disembarked Sirena in mid January. That cruise was on par with any of the other 5 O cruises we have taken. Better in some ways and worse in others. Overall, it was excellent.

Apologies if I misinterpreted what you had said earlier about O’s approach to refunding cancelled excursions was unethical.

This is consistent with my understanding and treatment. Tours paid on SM credits are the last to be cancelled. Our incident happened before we boarded so it went to the credit card. Assuming the same approach is taken on board, the refund would be a refundable on board credit.

You could opt for a PH or concierge level cabin to get a head start. If you go to PH or above, you are not obligated to use your butler but may find him of some value. Absent spending money to get an earlier booking time, you will have to be very flexible in your dining time and keep a look out for cancellations before and during your cruise. We tend to opt for sharing for our specialty restaurants and over the past 12 or so dinners have only had 1 that I regret but that was down to the fact that 1 couple did not really fit in. You could try redirecting the conversation away from politics. Don’t shut the conversation down, but let them finish their thought and then tactfully change the subject. Talk about previous travels, their children, their jobs, their hobbies, etc.

Yes, we used it so did not lose it. This all happened before boarding so working it out was fairly straightforward. Had it happened while on board, we may have ended up with unused credits if we had been unable to find a suitable replacement. However, nothing about the way O treated us can be considered unethical. The cancelled tour was the first one we selected and was paid for with the SM credit, but the refund was applied to the additional monies we had paid for tours in excess of the SM credit. Because it was paid with SM credits, Ocould have applied the refund to the SM credits, but did not. The approach they took was more than fair and is certainly not unethical.

We “spent” the surplus credits on a different excursion but they would not have been refundable if we had not been able to find one that was available and of interest to us. The lesson is that if one spends more than the SM credit on excursions, the risk of having surplus SM credit at the end of the cruise is lower and only you can decide if taking those additional excursions is a reasonable risk premium. IMHO, the “game’ is fairly easy to understand and the risk can be hedged if you see value in doing so. The fact that refunds are deemed to accrue first to non-SM excursions irrespective of how they were originally allocated seems fair to me, and is certainly not unethical.