guernseyguy Posted April 21, 2004 #1 Share Posted April 21, 2004 From today's New York Times: North Atlantic Storms Slow Queen Mary 2's Maiden Voyage to New York By JAMES BARRON Published: April 21, 2004 Ah well, thats all right then! Though what they were doing off Scotland defeats me....and surely not a dig at the fragrant Cindy? Peter [This message was edited by LauraSterling on 04-21-04 at 01:49 PM.] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linerguy Posted April 21, 2004 #2 Share Posted April 21, 2004 Thanks. Well, if she was suppose to dock at 8am and now she's going to be two hours late, that means she should pass under the bridge at 845am......right? I'm off to the airport to catch my flight. Russ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeanne S Posted April 21, 2004 #3 Share Posted April 21, 2004 Russ: Ships take approximately and hour and a half to travel from the VN bridge to the pier. QE2 used to pass under at 5:30 and dock at 7am. So if the ship is now expected in at 10am, it should pass under the bridge at 8:30 am. We were going to wait at the Battery on the way to work around 6:15 am (when the ship should have passed if it was on schedule). I guess we can go the view from the bridge cam and when we see the ship has entered Upper New York Bay, walk down to the Promenade in Brooklyn Heights (near work) and view it as it approaches the Battery. Have a great trip! Jeanne Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeanne S Posted April 21, 2004 #4 Share Posted April 21, 2004 and - so we did not even realize the ship was arriving at 8am (just assumed it would be the usual 7am time), so thanks for posting this. Jeanne Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crouton Posted April 21, 2004 #5 Share Posted April 21, 2004 I hope they leave just a little of that storm for us crossing eastbound. Crouton @NYC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dolphins Posted April 21, 2004 #6 Share Posted April 21, 2004 After the experience of the passengers on the first trans-Atlantic crossing, I still don't see how Cunard is going to fill all those cabins for 26 crossings in 2005? Six days of rocking and rolling with no ports doesn't sound like a cruise magnet to me. Don't be surprised if the itinerary is subject to revision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeanne S Posted April 22, 2004 #7 Share Posted April 22, 2004 I do think of QM2 as a Cruise Magnet, rather a Crossing Magnet. Cunard has a monopoly on crossings and on QE2 as always been able to charge higher rates for these passages (as oppossed to its sailings to ports)for a ship without much in the way of modern cruise ammenities. Some of us prefer the ship as a destination, with ports being secondary. Indeed, on a crossing, one has more time to enjoy shipboard life. In order to fill a ship this size perhaps fares will become more affordable - is a good thing, thus Cunard should not have a problem filling QM2. The weather is not always Force 10 on crossings. In April, one does take the risk of bad weather. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.