Aussie_Kingpin Posted January 28, 2009 #1 Share Posted January 28, 2009 The stupid State Government is moving the Cruise Terminal from Darling Harbour to White Bay. That area is already a traffic nightmare. I'd suggest emailing protests to Joe Tripodi, the Minister for Ports and Waterways. His email address is:- joe@tripodi.minister.nsw.gov.au It wouldn't hurt to email your local member of State (if you are in NSW) and Federal Parliament, too. The article from the Sydney Morning Herald:- Brian Robins January 29, 2009 OVERLOOKING a disused power station, with not a coffee shop or restaurant in sight, Balmain's White Bay will become the entry point for hundreds of thousands of international tourists visiting Sydney. For residents of the inner west, the decision means a peninsula that already carries heavy traffic will face even more congestion each time a cruise ship comes to port. For a city trying to revamp its tourist appeal, the journey from the terminal across Anzac Bridge to the city's main attractions would take the gloss off the visit. "White Bay is a sub-optimal location," said Ann Sherry, the head of Carnival Australia, which handles the largest number of cruise ships visiting Sydney. The Government announced the little-noticed decision just before Christmas. The Minister for Ports, Joe Tripodi, and the Planning Minister, Kristina Keneally, are behind the move to White Bay, which will create political difficulties for the local member, Verity Firth, a rising star in the Government, who holds the education portfolio. She holds the seat of Balmain by a margin of only 3.75 per cent and any backlash could let the seat fall to the Greens. "As far as we are concerned the Government has not thought through the idea at all," said the Leichhardt Mayor, Jamie Parker. "It is a high-density residential area and traffic in and out of White Bay is already a nightmare." Each cruise ship arrival would involve 600-1000 traffic movements, and at least 30 truck movements, which would be repeated for each departure. Port facilities for visiting cruise ships were included in the initial Barangaroo redevelopment at East Darling Harbour but they have since been dropped. The Government says cruise ships need an onshore "exclusion zone" for immigration and customs, which will be available only at White Bay, even though internationally such facilities are incorporated in port-side shopping malls. The Government has said the White Bay terminal will be temporary, but the existing Darling Harbour facility was also supposed to be temporary and it has been in use for a decade. When it is operational, the White Bay terminal will handle more than 75 vessels a year. Cruise ship demand is well ahead of port capacity but the Government has yet to clarify its longer-term thinking for the industry, particularly whether White Bay will be a permanent solution. "For a State Government so keen on big announcements, they sure kept this one under wraps," the Opposition ports spokesman, Andrew Stoner, said. "Residents and the local council were not even told about the plans. If Joe Tripodi and Verity Firth want a cruise ship terminal built in Balmain they should have at least have had the guts to consult with the local community." http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/terminal-a-nightmare-for-residents/2009/01/28/1232818532082.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Busy Mum Posted January 28, 2009 #2 Share Posted January 28, 2009 Gee I hope the NSW Government has a change of heart - the current location is just perfect for us people from interstate. We can spend the night before our cruise in Darling Harbour, wander down to the Wharf and have no transport hassles!!! 3 sleeps to go!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qld cruiser Posted January 28, 2009 #3 Share Posted January 28, 2009 Hi there, we heard a whisper last year that this would happen, however when I mentioned it on CC, I was told I was wrong. The cruise industry has so many passengers passing through on a regular basis, there will have to be a decent second terminal . kind regards, Lorraine:):) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiwi Kruzer Posted January 29, 2009 #4 Share Posted January 29, 2009 I cant understand the move away from Pier 8. I realise the area is up for redevelopment but the cruise ships could be used as an attraction in themselves. Look how many people go to Circular Quay to view the ships. And it is not as if there is a ship in every single day of the year. When I was told that a new Terminal was being planned, I always assumed it would be beside the present one. Surely there is enough room along there to berth 3 cruise all at once if need be...as long as they can get under the bridge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sailawaysally Posted January 29, 2009 #5 Share Posted January 29, 2009 I'd rather see the ships terminal at Newcastle than White Bay! Just when we have cheap accommodation right near the Wharf 8 terminal, easy to get to from the train, 24 hr convenience store, coffee shops everywhere, pub across the road, WHY SHIFT????? No doubt someone wants to build 5 star accommodation in that area! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brossy Posted January 29, 2009 #6 Share Posted January 29, 2009 How ridiculous to move the cruise terminal further in and still have to contend with the bridge :rolleyes:. Can you catch a train to Balmain? I vote for Newcastle too :). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jessica3152 Posted January 29, 2009 #7 Share Posted January 29, 2009 Currently the NSW Gov't couldn't afford to build a mooring point for a "tinny" so I wouldn't get too fussed just yet. This is probably just a project on their wish-list they are sending to Kevin-747 for potential federal funding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MargnGrah Posted January 29, 2009 #8 Share Posted January 29, 2009 Well I have done my bit and sent off an email of protest......wonder if it will help???:confused: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SY7DNEY CRUISER Posted January 30, 2009 #9 Share Posted January 30, 2009 This is typical of the State Government no planning this terminal must stay at Darling. The proposed site is distant from the city and the roads are already grid locked with traffic. Sydney is the best Harbor in the world. There is also a problem with terminals east of the bridge the ships are getting larger the Mellenium had had to anchor in the Harbor. Celebrity have with it next year from Australia. The QM has to dock at the Naval Base. The cruise lines bring in millions of dollars to the economy of Sydney this will stop unless the government provides the proper facilities. The terminal at Circular Quay and Darling Harbor are inadequate and both need urgent upgrading. Richard West Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thied Posted February 1, 2009 #10 Share Posted February 1, 2009 http://www.pocruises.com.au/html/concerns-over-cruise-ship-terminal-proposed-for-white-bay.cfm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiwi Kruzer Posted February 1, 2009 #11 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Do the Govt not realise that passengers arrive in Sydney to join their cruise from all parts of the globe.Just go out to the International airport and see the busloads that arrive and depart. Interstate passengers flow through the Domestic terminal on turnaround days as well . From that article it would appear P&O are not very happy. Ms Sherry said the current cruise terminal at Darling Harbour encouraged passengers to progressively arrive because it was close to the cafes, restaurants, shops and other activity. Families drop their bags at the terminal and then use it as an opportunity to sightsee, visiting Sydney Aquarium and other sites. In addition, the wharf was close to Wynyard railway station, which encouraged some passengers to use public transport. "There is so much to see and do around Darling Harbour. In comparison, White Bay is bleak with no buzz or energy to encourage passengers to spend their time or money before getting onto the ship," Ms Sherry said. "The NSW Government has an opportunity to create a world-class cruise facility but, based on the plans we’ve been shown, it is a shed at White Bay with nothing else around it." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cruisin-m Posted February 2, 2009 #12 Share Posted February 2, 2009 The state government are a joke, by attempting to "cheap out" on cruise terminals they will effectively destroy the cruising industry which is growing rapidly in Australia at the same time affecting the amount of taxes contributed to the economy. They should facilitate growth in the indutry by improving the facility at Darling Harbour or building a new or improved one in similar location which will bring more cruise ships as well as improve Australia's tourism industry. If cruise terminal moved from Wharf 8 or OPT our decision to cruise would definitely be affected, these are in such convient locations for public transport/city buses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Big_M Posted February 2, 2009 #13 Share Posted February 2, 2009 Even less so now, I have no idea what they were thinking when they sold off the Woolloomooloo wharves to private interests. What a ridiculous decision then, made all the more apparent now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sailawaysally Posted February 2, 2009 #14 Share Posted February 2, 2009 I would say that those making the decisions have never cruised because otherwise they would know just how the Wharf 8 area is for travellers. I hope everyone is sending in emails or letters, I've already sent off a few. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiwi Kruzer Posted February 2, 2009 #15 Share Posted February 2, 2009 As well as doing cruises from, and to, both the OPT and Darling Harbour Wharf 8, I have done a few World Cruise segments and can say without any shadow of doubt that overseas visitors I have talked with, look forward with eager anticipation to sailing into Sydney Harbour. For the most part it is the scenery from the best harbour in the World, but it is also the excitement that arriving at the present terminals engenders. Very few places on this globe can offer what Sydney can to visitors, and locals as well. WHY OH WHY do those in authourity want to throw it all away? As sailawaysally says ,perhaps they have never cruised before, or perhaps they are tied up in the time warp whereby they think cruising is only the domain of the rich and famous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcmh Posted February 2, 2009 #16 Share Posted February 2, 2009 We are on the Dawn Princess departing Feb. 22nd. Our departure has been changed to White Bay. Will we be the guinea pigs or are other ships departing from there prior to this date? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiwi Kruzer Posted February 3, 2009 #17 Share Posted February 3, 2009 Will we be the guinea pigs or are other ships departing from there prior to this date? Looks like you will be second. Amadea is using it to move to for her stay,and on your day,there will be Black Watch and Diamond Princess in town. Looks like it is just being used so far as an overflow. Love to hear back though about what it was like to leave from there. http://www.sydneyports.com.au/port_operations/cruise_schedule Amadea 18-Feb-2009 06:00 (Wed) 19-Feb-2009 01:00 (Thu) Overseas Passenger Terminal ISS Vships Amadea 19-Feb-2009 02:00 (Thu) 19-Feb-2009 23:30 (Thu) 5 White Bay ISS Vships Queen Victoria 19-Feb-2009 06:00 (Thu) 20-Feb-2009 18:30 (Fri) Overseas Passenger Terminal CVL Cunard Tahitian Princess 19-Feb-2009 07:00 (Thu) 19-Feb-2009 22:00 (Thu) Wharf 8 - Darling Harbour CVL Princess Cruises Black Watch 21-Feb-2009 07:00 (Sat) 23-Feb-2009 18:30 (Mon) Wharf 8 - Darling Harbour BWL Fred Olsen Cruise Lines Diamond Princess 22-Feb-2009 06:00 (Sun) 22-Feb-2009 21:00 (Sun) Overseas Passenger Terminal CVL Princess Cruises Dawn Princess 22-Feb-2009 07:00 (Sun) 22-Feb-2009 16:00 (Sun) 5 White Bay CVL Princess Cruises Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSWP Posted February 3, 2009 #18 Share Posted February 3, 2009 We are on the Dawn Princess departing Feb. 22nd. Our departure has been changed to White Bay. Will we be the guinea pigs or are other ships departing from there prior to this date? Friends of ours are also on Dawn Princess, leaving from White Bay on 22 Feb, they are spewing also. What a joke, no consultation with local council and community is against State Government policies, but they got away with it. A disgrace of a place for our people and international visitors to embark and disembark from. ALSO, think of the ships crews who rarely get ashore, and at White Bay they will have a problem, no public transport, taxi fares are way out of their price range and the return journey times by shuttle bus (if provided) would make it difficult for crew to visit the Sydney CBD. The crew will not be happy campers, in fact they will be unhappy vegemites. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiwi Kruzer Posted February 3, 2009 #19 Share Posted February 3, 2009 ALSO, think of the ships crews who rarely get ashore, and at White Bay they will have a problem, no public transport, taxi fares are way out of their price range and the return journey times by shuttle bus (if provided) would make it difficult for crew to visit the Sydney CBD. The crew will not be happy campers, Thats a very good point you have made. happy crew =happy ship=happy cruise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brossy Posted February 3, 2009 #20 Share Posted February 3, 2009 I just received a reply via email thanking me for my concern and requesting my residential address so they can keep me informed :rolleyes:. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Big_M Posted February 3, 2009 #21 Share Posted February 3, 2009 ALSO, think of the ships crews who rarely get ashore, and at White Bay they will have a problem, no public transport, taxi fares are way out of their price range and the return journey times by shuttle bus (if provided) would make it difficult for crew to visit the Sydney CBD. The crew will not be happy campers, in fact they will be unhappy vegemites. It's not that there are no ports in the city - as it stands the OPT is still in place. Given there are a number of ports in this part of the world which are even further away from the destination and that it's still likely they can sometimes berth closer in, I don't see that it will be such a turn-off for the crew. Most of the crew I've spoken to don't get off at each port each time anyway (they're too tired!), so will more likely choose those occasions when it is a more convenient location for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sailawaysally Posted February 3, 2009 #22 Share Posted February 3, 2009 You would be surprised then to see how many got off at Wharf 8 on our last cruise. I saw at least 100 get off and spoke to those we already knew and they were so excited to at last have their day off in Sydney. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiwi Kruzer Posted February 3, 2009 #23 Share Posted February 3, 2009 I understood the crew always looked forward to Sydney as even if they only had a couple of hours off they could make the most of it as everything is right there for them and they dont have to spend time travelling into town. At White Bay they will only have time to get into town then come back....... thats if the taxi driver knows the way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSWP Posted February 3, 2009 #24 Share Posted February 3, 2009 I understood the crew always looked forward to Sydney as even if they only had a couple of hours off they could make the most of it as everything is right there for them and they dont have to spend time travelling into town. At White Bay they will only have time to get into town then come back....... thats if the taxi driver knows the way. Exactly David..the crew opportunity for a few hours ashore and well earned too will be impacted upon. Think of the lost $ to the economy at Darling Harbour, many retailers and restaurant owners at Darling Harbour are already struggling, this will sink a few of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MargnGrah Posted February 3, 2009 #25 Share Posted February 3, 2009 It's not that there are no ports in the city - as it stands the OPT is still in place. Given there are a number of ports in this part of the world which are even further away from the destination and that it's still likely they can sometimes berth closer in, I don't see that it will be such a turn-off for the crew. Most of the crew I've spoken to don't get off at each port each time anyway (they're too tired!), so will more likely choose those occasions when it is a more convenient location for them. The cost of berthing at OPT is about 4 times the price of berthing cost at Darling Harbour. While I'm sure that P&O and Princess would love to dock there every cruise it is just not possible. The prices of cruises would have to go up to help cover it. :eek: Darling Harbour it a fantastic place for the wharf and it should stay there, for all the reason that have been posted above!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.