Which cruise line

[OCruisers]

I think you will find that Princess and HAL have better itineraries (as they can get into Glacier Bay) and will be competitive price wise with your Crown and Anchor discount. Princess and HAL have a far larger commitment in Alaska and it shows IMO.

 

Agree! :)

[golferwomen2]

If smoking matter go Princess. Royal has lots of smokers, they can even smoke on the balcony:mad:

[Jocecruise]

Out of all these posts I only see one that mentions Norwegian Cruise Line.

We have just started looking and are considering NCL.

 

Is there a reason why they are not mentioned? Not as good?

 

 

we did our Alaskan cruise with NCL and we loved it very much. It was our first cruise so did not have point of comparison. But we were very impressed!:)

[bonvoyagie]

I also have sailed AK on NCL and love the product - however the OP was only interested in Princess or RCCL - hence most posters have been about those two lines.

[JimAOk1945]

RCCL or Princess for Alaska cruise???

 

We have sailed on both. Between the two we enjoyed RCCL more because of the itinerary which included Icy Strait Point and Hubbard Glacier.

[dsw39]

I also have sailed AK on NCL and love the product - however the OP was only interested in Princess or RCCL - hence most posters have been about those two lines.

 

I agree! We are sailing b2b on NCL this year and love the itinerary. Sawyer Glacier was a disapointment the last time we sailed.

Dave

[RetiredArmyCruiser]

We chose the NCL Sun northbound itinerary because it leaves Vancouver on a Monday. We were able to combine it with a weekend vacation in Seattle beforehand (extended family lives in Seattle area). It works out perfect for us and our work schedules. Having sailed on NCL before, I know what to expect and we like their product. Our cruise goes to both Glacier Bay and Hubbard Glacier.

 

Whatever you choose, the true star will be Alaska itself.

[BubMunkeyBles]

We chose based on itinerary. We will probably only cruise Alaska once. I almost switched to HAL but then their rates increased for the one I wanted.

[kayehall]

What is the difference between Hubbard Glacier and Glacier Bay? I know it is 2 different areas but which one is better?

[232271]

We have done Princess and Celebrity, and Glaciar Bay and Hubbard.

 

We LOVED our Celebrity Millinieum cruise, the ship was amazing and the brunch buffet they have on last sea day is SPECTACULAR. Yes, it was an "older" crowd and we are in our 40's. Also, we thought Hubbard would be a dissapointment compared to Glaciar bay, WRONG, we saw more calving and were able to get so close to glacier it was wonderfull!! oh and ICY STRAIT is where we saw TONS of whales jumping and some had their babies with them.

 

Princess Diamond had great dining, but I thought the ship was "tired".

 

BUT this is just my two cents, I will say that the ONE WAY trips are the way to go, as you see more.

[232271]

We chose based on itinerary. We will probably only cruise Alaska once. I almost switched to HAL but then their rates increased for the one I wanted.

 

we wanted to do HAL but on our last 2 previous Alaska cruises, while in port of Ketchikan we rode the bus and when we stopped at HAL, seriously the folks that got on all were 70 and above, we asked becuase we were so surprised and they said YES that it's definatally known as the "older" crowd.

and we did go to a AAA meeting for HAL and when asked our ages, 42/43, we were the youngest by 15 years in that room!

[BubMunkeyBles]

we wanted to do HAL but on our last 2 previous Alaska cruises, while in port of Ketchikan we rode the bus and when we stopped at HAL, seriously the folks that got on all were 70 and above, we asked becuase we were so surprised and they said YES that it's definatally known as the "older" crowd.

and we did go to a AAA meeting for HAL and when asked our ages, 42/43, we were the youngest by 15 years in that room!

 

I cruised HAL as a kid to Alaska and had a great time. I was only 10. But everyone at dinner with us was probably over 70. Maybe another time we'll do HAL. I'd love to go to Sitka or Kodiak so maybe we'll try to hit one of those up down the line.

[Kesstral]

My first cruise last year was with RCCL on a round-trip (Van-Seattle) with Tracy Arm (Sawyer Glacier). I was a bit sad that I didn't do my homework (aka hadn't found CC prior to booking) and didn't check for itinerary options first. We couldn't get too close to the glacier but I thought it was still amazing for early May. This year we're going on what sounds like the only HAL cruise to Alaska that wont go to Glacier Bay. It's actually the same exact itinerary we did last year but we only booked because friends had already committed to this sailing.

 

Make sure you decide what you want to see and then figure out which cruise line offers those locations and if they are in your price range.

Living near Vancouver, BC I will probably have lots of oppourtunity to check out all the ports I want so I'm not too worried about duplicates. I am also looking forward to this HAL cruise for the comparison and because RCCL's west coast offerings are very limited (I really hate flying).

[Phyllis13]

Hi all

Does anyone know when HAL will be releasing their 2014 schedule for Alaska? We want to do the 7 day round trip from Vancouver on Volendam and any stateroom recommendations (two needed) would be very welcome. We're thinking of opting for the lowest grade verandahs but would like advice on location etc. Many Thanks!;)

[lilrod]

I just booked on NCL for Alaska 2014 for July. At this moment only this cruise line has released the 2014 itineraries for their ships.

 

The ship is the Norwegian Jewel. The best thing is the freestyle and going on this trip it will be good.

[donaldsc]

Go with the one that goes to Glacier Bay.

 

DON

[B Russo]

I've been watching HAL prices and I noticed that with HAL's recent "fare sale" they actually upped the price for 3rd and 4th persons in Alaska sailing. (so the price for me and DH went down by $50 per person but my DD's fare went up by $200!

 

Also, I was not impressed by the way they priced a third person with their cruisetours, and it was part of the reason we decided to do the landtour ourselves (although I'm slightly stressed about it).

 

Finally, I'll add that I'm new to the whole Alaska thing and I booked based on itinerary and when choosing between HAL and Princess (because they both went to Glacier Bay), I ultimately decided that ship size was important to us. For the sailings I was looking at it seemed like HAL ships were smaller. For example, Statendam had 1260 passengers / 580 crew and the Zaandam had 1440 passengers and 647 crew. Comparing this to 2670 passengers and 1100 crew for the Sapphire Princess and 1970 Passengers and 900 crew for the Coral Princess, it was easier for me to go with HAL.

 

I actually think this is less important for others but for various reasons it seemed important to me.

 

I have to say that I looked at pricing at all the cruise lines and found them to be very comparable. Of course, I didn't even consider getting Verandah. I think there may be more variation in pricing on those.

 

Good luck. Amy

We like HAL with there smaller ships. We just don't go on large ships. Bill

[SuzyQ123]

:)My husband and I traveled to Alaska with Princess in 2011 and it totally changed our opinion of Princess. We had gone a couple times to the Carribean and it was ok, but, to Alaska we felt it was the best. We took a cruise/tour and they did a fantastic job and totally took any guesswork out of the vacation. They were always handy if you did have a problem or question, and it was a quick decision when we decided to return to Alaska this coming summer for our 4oth anniversary using Princess. For most of the tours it was even a Princess bus driver so they had a vested interest in making you satisfied. Many times, the bus driver would take pictures of you without being asked. On the tours you stayed at Princess owned lodges, and they had someone available in the lobby for any questions.