Cigar King Posted December 24, 2022 #151 Share Posted December 24, 2022 On 12/22/2022 at 7:10 AM, Biker19 said: She looks a bit rough: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hal2008 Posted December 24, 2022 #152 Share Posted December 24, 2022 On 5/28/2022 at 8:58 AM, deliver42 said: It's already been established that is was pilot error, not the captain's. Very minor damage to the ship, and they are already working on the dock. But confused. Isn't Falmouth is one of the few ports where there is no pilot? Captain Cedric on Odyssey said so in his captain corner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biker19 Posted June 14, 2023 #153 Share Posted June 14, 2023 On 5/26/2022 at 12:42 PM, sergeant655 said: Radiance hit a mooring dolphin in Sitka last week . I heard a loud crash and felt the shutter when it hit when it was Swinging around to back in " Overreliance on an electronic chart, miscommunication and an outdated navigational chart were all factors in Radiance of the Seas damaging a cruise terminal pier last year near Sitka, Alaska, the National Transportation Safety Board said Tuesday. The Royal Caribbean International ship was docking at the Sitka Sound Cruise Terminal on May 9, 2022 when it struck and damaged a mooring dolphin. The ship sustained a minor hull indentation. The mooring dolphin sustained damage to three of the four pilings supporting it. $2.1m in damages and rest of season impacted There were no reported injuries to the 1,375 passengers, 782 crew and four pilots on board. The contact resulted in $2.1m in damages to the pier and impacted cruise ship traffic to the Sitka Sound Cruise Terminal for the remainder of the 2022 season. In April 2021, the Sitka Sound Cruise Terminal pier was extended by 395 feet, including adding two mooring dolphins connected by a walkway and a 410-foot-long floating dock next to the existing dolphins. NOAA not informed of pier extension The terminal did not inform the National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration, the agency in charge of updating US coastal nautical charts, of the extension. NOAA had no record of the construction until NTSB investigators informed them of the pier’s extension after the contact. At the time of the contact, the electronic navigation chart (ENC) the cruise ship was using did not show the extended pier or added dolphins. Radiance of the Seas crew relied heavily on the vessel’s electronic chart and information system (ECDIS) to plan and execute their docking. The master and bridge team had other navigational technologies, including radars and cameras, available to assist them with the approach to the terminal. Even with these tools available, the crew relied solely on the ECDIS, which showed an inaccurate ENC. Master-bosun miscommunication While docking, the bosun and master did not confirm the type of distances that were being communicated. The bosun was relaying accurate distances to the pier’s northernmost dolphin, but the master incorrectly assumed the bosun was calling out how much clearance the ship would have as the stern passed the dolphin. The NTSB determined the probable cause of the contact was the master and bridge team’s overreliance on an electronic chart to identify the pier’s position relative to their planned rotation location, and the master’s misunderstanding of the clearance distances to the pier being called by the crew member on the stern while the vessel was rotating. Contributing was the Sitka Sound Cruise Terminal not reporting the extension of the pier into the waterway to the appropriate hydrographic authority in order to update the relevant navigational chart. Lessons learned NTSB investigators cited two lessons learned as a result of the investigation: voyage planning and reporting port or terminal modifications. 'Proper voyage planning includes developing a complete plan for every phase of the voyage, from the vessel’s starting port to its end port (berth to berth), including leaving the dock and mooring,' the report said. 'Reference points for maneuvering should be identified, measured precisely and reported clearly. Vessel bridge teams should also ensure that they have the most up-to-date data before getting underway and consult with the local pilot(s) on the accuracy of navigation charts to ensure depictions of ports and/or terminals are correct. 'Ports and terminals should immediately report significant modifications to port or terminal configurations to the appropriate hydrographic authority (for example, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) so that charts can be updated and the changes made readily available to vessel owners, operators, and crews/bridge teams,' the report continued. The full marine investigation report is available here. " NTSB determines causes of cruise ship striking Sitka pier (seatrade-cruise.com) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokeybandit Posted June 14, 2023 #154 Share Posted June 14, 2023 2.1 million for that? Goodness I'm in the wrong business. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucfan2 Posted June 14, 2023 #155 Share Posted June 14, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, smokeybandit said: 2.1 million for that? Goodness I'm in the wrong business. del Edited June 14, 2023 by bucfan2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luv2sailAgain Posted June 15, 2023 #156 Share Posted June 15, 2023 On 6/14/2023 at 7:03 AM, Biker19 said: " Overreliance on an electronic chart, miscommunication and an outdated navigational chart were all factors in Radiance of the Seas damaging a cruise terminal pier last year near Sitka, Alaska, the National Transportation Safety Board said Tuesday, Thank you for the post. We sailed on Ovation last June and our first port was Sitka. We were able to dock, but I was worried for a bit and always wondered what happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now