Jump to content

Grand Pacific Voyage Greetings from the Shadow


shipsmail

Recommended Posts

Yesterday we boarded the SHADOW for her fourth leg of the Grand Pacific Voyage in Singapore. There are only 162 passengers onboard for this cruise and on the third leg (SYD to SIN) the number was only 138. Good for those onboard, but difficult for the economics of the cruise line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And imagine they will have the newbuild Spirit soon. The present economic tsunami has no end in the foreseeable future. Not just for Silversea, but for all cruise lines with newbuilds, the future is even bleaker!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps they will institute a policy that if a certain voyage is not at least X percent booked, then it will be cancelled. Those px that did book could be allowed to switch to something else.:confused:

 

How about dropping the prices or the single supplement for solo travellers? Or better 'special' deals for Venetian Society members.

 

Cancelling cruises could be a problem because in many instances people cannot cancel their airline flights without a penalty.

 

We don't want our favourite cruiseline to fail - so what is the answer?

 

Cheers

Ging466

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The answer is...show up. We are leaving Sunday for the Middle East so we can go thru the Suez Canal on a practically empty ship! Wish us luck!

Is there going to be a warship escort for your cruise? Unlike the Suez, there should be no pirates for the grand Pacific voyage!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd think cancelling is more expensive than running a half empty ship. Whether the ship is working or not, they have to pay the staff and the maintenance. It cost money to dock the unused ship somewhere, too. I don't know what % is their breakeven point, but my guess is quite a bit below 50%. I'm guessing that a 50% occupancy covers the cost of running the ship and gives them not much but some profit. The occupancy rate has to go down quite a bit more for them to cancel a cruise. They did that after the 9/11 by dry docking them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These half empty ships are the reason SS is now extending the $1000 OBC to more cruises and have extended the booking deadline to the end of July. I hope it works because there is only so long they can continue to subsidize vacant ships. If not my prediction is not that they'll cancel cruises but they'll take one or two ships out of commission until the economy rebounds. With the Spirit coming in December that's another 540 berths to fill each cruise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope it works because there is only so long they can continue to subsidize vacant ships. If not my prediction is not that they'll cancel cruises but they'll take one or two ships out of commission until the economy rebounds. With the Spirit coming in December that's another 540 berths to fill each cruise.
Agreed, that was what we suggested a month ago.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If not my prediction is not that they'll cancel cruises but they'll take one or two ships out of commission until the economy rebounds.

 

That's what they did after the 9/11. I would be curious to know at what point it cheaper to take ships out of commission than running it. What's there breakeven point? Does anyone know?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about dropping the prices or the single supplement for solo travellers? Or better 'special' deals for Venetian Society members.

 

Cancelling cruises could be a problem because in many instances people cannot cancel their airline flights without a penalty.

 

We don't want our favourite cruiseline to fail - so what is the answer?

 

Cheers

Ging466

 

 

Amen regarding the single supplement.

 

I could not find the supplement for the cruise on which OP is sailing. But the lowest supplement for the next leg is 75%.

 

RSSC (which to my mind has a very comparable product) generally has a 40% supplement.

 

I have lots of nights on Silversea. However, I will not pay these very high single supplements.

 

I do not see why SS would not prefer to have a passenger paying, say, 140% for a suite than having the suite sail empty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, just maybe if SS had let me know via email and offered 50% off (or even more;)) I might have jumped at the Syd Sing leg... and I have subscribed for venetians..

 

Free accom (friend) in Sing and airline points home would have made it a very good offer.

 

instead i get snail mail for cruises that will cost me more to get to than to sail on...

 

Surely a buttock on the bed at 50% off is better than sailing more than 50% empty??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think they want to cheapen the product. What I saw on my cruise was reduced menus and stuff, and I will look for them to cut down staff to have a more realistic staff to guest ratio that 2 to 1. The far east always sails light. What they will likely do in the future is redirect itineraries, but that stuff will probably happen for 2011. With the 25% single supplements on Spirit and the newness idea, I think it will be the easiest to fill...for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Debbie, can you please be a bit more specific by what you mean when you say "reduced menus and stuff?" Have they cut down on services too? And what kinds of things have they cut from the menu? Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Menues are like on other cruises with Silversea ships IMO. I cannot see them reduced. Service is great. Ship is in very good condition.

The cruise consultant was not very open in informing me about reduced prices and booking situation in my first conversation. But she said that with extended payment discount the booking went much better for 2010. I do not know if this is true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted all the menus from my cruise, and they were definitely reduced. Quality was the same, but there was one soup instead of two, maybe one less entree or whatever, and they were not showing the page with the things you could get every day like the spring rolls, shrimp cocktail, etc. However, if you asked, all of that was available. Service was fabulous, one of the best ever, and quality was super high. I am just saying if you have 160 instead of 360, of course you can expect they may have a slightly smaller menu. Everyone does it, but they still do the special requests in a day, and they have new things and many old favorites, too. What I was trying to say is that if they have whatever it is, 3 entrees instead of 4 or whatever (knowing in the back of our minds the steak, salmon, etc. is still there), that is better than suddenly serving Olive Garden quality or something. I would not worry about a thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Forum Jump
    • Categories
      • Welcome to Cruise Critic
      • Hurricane Zone 2024
      • Cruise Insurance Q&A w/ Steve Dasseos of Tripinsurancestore.com June 2024
      • New Cruisers
      • Cruise Lines “A – O”
      • Cruise Lines “P – Z”
      • River Cruising
      • ROLL CALLS
      • Cruise Critic News & Features
      • Digital Photography & Cruise Technology
      • Special Interest Cruising
      • Cruise Discussion Topics
      • UK Cruising
      • Australia & New Zealand Cruisers
      • Canadian Cruisers
      • North American Homeports
      • Ports of Call
      • Cruise Conversations
×
×
  • Create New...