Novastar Posted July 4, 2013 #1 Share Posted July 4, 2013 Recently I have been noticing more and more really old threads coming back to life. Some are 3, 4, 5 years old or older. What's the point? The original question has long since been answered. Information in the thread may no longer be valid. I wish CC would leave old threads available so that members can search for information but not allow any new postings to threads that are more than a year old. Who's with me on this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dustyroad Posted July 4, 2013 #2 Share Posted July 4, 2013 i have found valuable information in some of the old post that get bumped up again when I do a search for certain things. I have no problem with them at all. just ignore them if they are a bother to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luddite Posted July 4, 2013 #3 Share Posted July 4, 2013 Recently I have been noticing more and more really old threads coming back to life. Some are 3, 4, 5 years old or older. What's the point? The original question has long since been answered. Information in the thread may no longer be valid. I wish CC would leave old threads available so that members can search for information but not allow any new postings to threads that are more than a year old. Who's with me on this? Pull up the 'omelet hogs' thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NLH Arizona Posted July 4, 2013 #4 Share Posted July 4, 2013 I have no problem if someone pulls up an old thread. If someone has a problem with it, then just don't respond to it. Same goes for those that come on complaining that a thread goes on and on; if they didn't post to it, it would be one less post that continues it to go on and on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cruiseat50 Posted July 4, 2013 #5 Share Posted July 4, 2013 I think it's because newbies are quite often told to do a search before they post a question. Some that do the search don't think to look at the dates. I tend not to look myself until a little ways in and think... hmm... this sounds vaguely familiar.:rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njhorseman Posted July 4, 2013 #6 Share Posted July 4, 2013 Recently I have been noticing more and more really old threads coming back to life. Some are 3, 4, 5 years old or older. What's the point? The original question has long since been answered. Information in the thread may no longer be valid. I wish CC would leave old threads available so that members can search for information but not allow any new postings to threads that are more than a year old. Who's with me on this? I'm with you. Firing up old threads, often chock full of what is now misinformation, is of no value to anyone. It seems to me if a thread has been inactive for a specified period...maybe six months or a year, it should be locked to prevent further posting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garycarla Posted July 4, 2013 #7 Share Posted July 4, 2013 I agree totally that old threads should be locked. Some of the information may be valid, some not so. Leave them for research purposes, but do not allow new postings. Maybe a year, two years? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rvsullivan Posted July 4, 2013 #8 Share Posted July 4, 2013 I'm with you. Firing up old threads, often chock full of what is now misinformation, is of no value to anyone. It seems to me if a thread has been inactive for a specified period...maybe six months or a year, it should be locked to prevent further posting. Yep, I agree. After 6 months-a year, lock em. Leave them searchable forever if you like, but after a long time the info is usually out of date anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tempura Posted July 4, 2013 #9 Share Posted July 4, 2013 I like the idea of locking old threads but allowing them to be found with a search. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NMLady Posted July 4, 2013 #10 Share Posted July 4, 2013 Yep, I agree. After 6 months-a year, lock em. Leave them searchable forever if you like, but after a long time the info is usually out of date anyway. I agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cubechick Posted July 4, 2013 #11 Share Posted July 4, 2013 Yep, I agree. After 6 months-a year, lock em. Leave them searchable forever if you like, but after a long time the info is usually out of date anyway. I also agree. That's how Trip Advisor operates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanDreaming2 Posted July 5, 2013 #12 Share Posted July 5, 2013 I also agree. That's how Trip Advisor operates. Exactly! And isn't TripAdvisor and Cruise Critic owned by the same organization? :confused: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Day91 Posted July 5, 2013 #13 Share Posted July 5, 2013 Why isn't the date of the original post included in the thread list view, or is that a personalizable option I've missed? My favorite forums on other topics mostly show this information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaja Posted July 5, 2013 #14 Share Posted July 5, 2013 There comes a point when some "old" threads are totally out of date...so it may be usefull for all..if CC could find a way to deal with this situation... While some info may be of help..much is not (esp when 6-12 monts old and more ) From what I have seen...theads of great interest are revived continuously until then run there course...then fade away...usually if the thread info is really important..then a new thread on topic will take its place will current info and input... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cubechick Posted July 5, 2013 #15 Share Posted July 5, 2013 Exactly! And isn't TripAdvisor and Cruise Critic owned by the same organization? :confused: Yep! Exactly why I mentioned it. Ironic, yes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.