Grand Princess in California waters

[Papa Yoda]

 

Uh-oh!

 

 

[1emerald1]

Haha just saw that too!

[Papa Yoda]

3 minutes ago, 1emerald1 said:

Haha just saw that too!

 

My 2nd thought was:  "So what else is new?"

[Sprocket]

Should say "Sh*t STILL at anchor in Long Beach, CA"

[Thrak]

Just checked this for myself and it's still that way. Showed it to my wife and got an actual out loud laugh. (It amazes me how often I see people post LOL when they really mean to voice mild amusement. Ahhh... the digital age.)

[brisalta]

Nice spelling...

 

According to marinetraffic.com she was at sea for 20 days and 14 hours.

https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/details/ships/shipid:370965/mmsi:310327000/imo:9104005/vessel:GRAND_PRINCESS

 

Probably putting in to port for supplies and or crew change.

 

Supposedly the port of Long Beach is backed up and ships have to wait days to actually dock...so that would add to the attitude of the person who made the caption.

 

Edited February 13, 2021 by brisalta

[Papa Yoda]

The Grand is at Pier 93 San Pedro but still has that feces problem...  

 

[CynCyn]

32 minutes ago, Papa Yoda said:

The Grand is at Pier 93 San Pedro but still has that feces problem...  

 

Blonde moment.  Did not see the typo and read the thread........

 

NOW I GET IT! 

[Roberto256]

17 hours ago, Papa Yoda said:

 

Uh-oh!

 

 

 

That has long been my opinion of Grand, especially after they removed skywalkers.

 

I went on Grand quite a few times.  In 1997/1998.

That was a long time ago.

 

P.S. I wonder if that is a joke by some future-ex-employee...

[brisalta]

5 hours ago, Papa Yoda said:

The Grand is at Pier 93 San Pedro but still has that feces problem...  

 

 

 

I have not been to that port but from the bridge cam view it appears to be not a pretty site.

 

[Roberto256]

5 hours ago, Papa Yoda said:

The Grand is at Pier 93 San Pedro but still has that feces problem...  

 

As well as not being 'at anchor...' ; regardless of any bridge commentary on the ship or port!  🙂

 

[brisalta]

3 minutes ago, Roberto256 said:

As well as not being 'at anchor...' ; regardless of any bridge commentary on the ship or port!  🙂

 

 

Last night it was at anchor...today it is docked in port.  Maybe the person responsible for the captions has been relieved of duty but no one else knows how to change the caption. 😉

[TwoBadKnees]

Probably safe to say no one at Princess or Carnival Corp has seen this thread.

Edited February 14, 2021 by TwoBadKnees

[brisalta]

2 hours ago, TwoBadKnees said:

Probably safe to say no one at Princess or Carnival Corp has seen this thread.

 

Are you sure about that? :

 

Edited February 14, 2021 by brisalta

[TwoBadKnees]

At the time I wrote my post it still had the original caption.

[charlie murphy]

On 2/13/2021 at 1:34 PM, brisalta said:

 

Last night it was at anchor...today it is docked in port.  Maybe the person responsible for the captions has been relieved of duty but no one else knows how to change the caption. 😉

did you mean 'may be the person responsible for the caption has been  " relieved of his doodie"''

thanks for the post that was funny!

[HBCcruiser]

On 2/13/2021 at 1:27 PM, brisalta said:

 

 

I have not been to that port but from the bridge cam view it appears to be not a pretty site.

 

 

Oh yeh, Princess staff definitely read this thread! They even changed the view just for you! 🤣