Jump to content

New CDC Guidance - Avoid Cruise Travel Regardless of Vaccination Status


WESTEAST
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, rodndonna said:

 

how many passengers in the last 2 weeks?

 

No mention in the article.  

 

It did state that there were 162 cases in the two weeks prior to Dec 15th - 29th, so a substantial jump in cases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, cbr663 said:

 

No mention in the article.  

 

It did state that there were 162 cases in the two weeks prior to Dec 15th - 29th, so a substantial jump in cases.

 

We cruised Dec 5-15, we were just saying how we had great timing!

 

That is quite a change but would be curious to see if the jump is more than the relative jump in cases generally.

 

Hopefully this will have all settled out in the next couple of weeks. REALLY REALLY hoping 😉

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, melbur said:

Since when does Canada pay any attention to CDC guidelines? They also recommend 5 day quarantine, but we stay at 14 days. 

I see we are 5 days as well now. At least that's today's news . . . tomorrow, who knows?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, melbur said:

Since when does Canada pay any attention to CDC guidelines? They also recommend 5 day quarantine, but we stay at 14 days. 

 

Ontario has come down to the 5 days 😀

 

https://toronto.ctvnews.ca/ontario-introduces-shortened-isolation-periods-new-testing-guidelines-1.5723606

Edited by rodndonna
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, melbrook said:

Canada has never lifted the "Avoid all cruise ship travel" advisory.  It's funny to me the shock waves created by the CDC saying the same thing.  

It is no accident that the US covid related deaths per million population currently stands at about 3 times the Canadian rate per million populaton.

Edited by iancal
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hadn't read about BC, but I saw Ontario (yesterday) and Alberta (to start Jan 3) have reduced it to 5 days as well. I wonder if the country will do so as well, so if out of the country and you test positive, you only need to quarantine for 5 days before you can fly home. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, MamatoJack said:

I hadn't read about BC, but I saw Ontario (yesterday) and Alberta (to start Jan 3) have reduced it to 5 days as well. I wonder if the country will do so as well, so if out of the country and you test positive, you only need to quarantine for 5 days before you can fly home. 

That's an interesting question. PHAC indicated on Wednesday that it wasn't planning on following the CDC's lead, but that was before some of the provinces switched to the shorter period. I suspect that the GOC will fall in line, although it has acted very independently on COVID issues in the past.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/30/2021 at 11:30 PM, melbur said:

Since when does Canada pay any attention to CDC guidelines? They also recommend 5 day quarantine, but we stay at 14 days. 

Our PHO in BC has just moved us down to 5 days also. 

Edited by mama-of-three
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The CDC set’s the requirements (health/disease) in which the cruise industry must follow. That sail from U S ports( and others) The next date to see which changes they must follow is the 15th of Jan.

A Canadian Gov advisory is for the population. So it is still a “your choice” 

 

So that said,  The CDC can put the ships sitting in ports.  That is the reason for the shock waves.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, melbrook said:

Canada has never lifted the "Avoid all cruise ship travel" advisory.  It's funny to me the shock waves created by the CDC saying the same thing.  

To put it in cruise terminology, the shock waves from a 300 pounded are a lot bigger in the belly flop contest than from a 95 pounder. The CDC carries a lot more 'weight' than  PHAC. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The numbers of infected on cruise ships (5000 in the final 2 weeks of 2021) is still well below the rate of infection in the US (somewhere around 30% lower) and the rate of infection in Canada.  And now that we are not testing asymptomatic exposures or non-high risk exposures, our reported infection rate numbers will be even lower than actual infection rate numbers.  Yet, cruise lines continue to require frequent testing so their infection rate numbers are likely more accurate, and yet still below national averages.)

 

In reality, though it would make sense for the infection rate to tail off in a few weeks, if it remained at its current state, pretty much all of Canada will have had COVID at some point by this time next year.  Is it not time to somehow just live with it and soldier on?

 

So, while I do not consider the cruise infection rates alarming, it is still not the time for us to cruise.  Just too high a potential for missed ports and too many extra hoops to travel right now.  Too high a stress level that something could go wrong, even if it is just a mild case of COVID.  But when the world settles down a bit, and decides how best to just weather the storm, maybe then these numbers will not frighten us into bad policy moves.

 

Don

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mud_Shark said:

The numbers of infected on cruise ships (5000 in the final 2 weeks of 2021) is still well below the rate of infection in the US (somewhere around 30% lower) and the rate of infection in Canada.  And now that we are not testing asymptomatic exposures or non-high risk exposures, our reported infection rate numbers will be even lower than actual infection rate numbers.  Yet, cruise lines continue to require frequent testing so their infection rate numbers are likely more accurate, and yet still below national averages.)

 

In reality, though it would make sense for the infection rate to tail off in a few weeks, if it remained at its current state, pretty much all of Canada will have had COVID at some point by this time next year.  Is it not time to somehow just live with it and soldier on?

 

So, while I do not consider the cruise infection rates alarming, it is still not the time for us to cruise.  Just too high a potential for missed ports and too many extra hoops to travel right now.  Too high a stress level that something could go wrong, even if it is just a mild case of COVID.  But when the world settles down a bit, and decides how best to just weather the storm, maybe then these numbers will not frighten us into bad policy moves.

 

Don

 

Other than boarding, I'm not aware of any out of the ordinary cruise line testing. I am actually very skeptical of cruise line reported positives. I believe they vastly under report cases contracted on board. Mostly because as far as I know once off a ship positive cases are bundled into the general population numbers. In fact I suspect that on most week long or shorter cruises, the reported non-crew positives are almost entirely contracted prior to boarding.

 

I agree that current conditions suggest a less than pleasant cruise experience. I guess I'm not a true addict. 😀

Edited by broberts
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • Forum Jump
    • Categories
      • Welcome to Cruise Critic
      • ANNOUNCEMENT: Set Sail on Sun Princess®
      • Hurricane Zone 2024
      • Cruise Insurance Q&A w/ Steve Dasseos of Tripinsurancestore.com June 2024
      • New Cruisers
      • Cruise Lines “A – O”
      • Cruise Lines “P – Z”
      • River Cruising
      • ROLL CALLS
      • Cruise Critic News & Features
      • Digital Photography & Cruise Technology
      • Special Interest Cruising
      • Cruise Discussion Topics
      • UK Cruising
      • Australia & New Zealand Cruisers
      • Canadian Cruisers
      • North American Homeports
      • Ports of Call
      • Cruise Conversations
×
×
  • Create New...