Jump to content

Balcony partitions between cabins-can they be opened?


NC Fred
 Share

Recommended Posts

On the Summit last summer, I asked our cabin attendant to open the partitions between 3 adjoining cabins. His reply was a new policy prevented them from being opened. Has anyone else experienced this and is it now a Celebrity policy on all ships with balconies?

 

Leaving on the Equinox in two weeks with the same situation of 3 adjoining cabins. We would love to open these partitions and have the use of all 3 balconies.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First we were just on Solstice last Nov and we had the divider open with our friends next store.

When it comes to the M Class ships in general the only balconies that can be opened are on deck 11 A1's. These cabins were added to M Class ships after Solstice was built with the new style of dividers. Along with Blu. Blu was cut out of the MDR. Photos from Summit.

 

IMG_20150811_140944821.thumb.jpg.7dbdba0b70c95fa9802a9f759e48c589.jpgIMG_20150811_140954960_HDR.thumb.jpg.cde61e5802d383642da71d37e2da1374.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, NC Fred said:

 

Leaving on the Equinox in two weeks with the same situation of 3 adjoining cabins. We would love to open these partitions and have the use of all 3 balconies.  

Please come back to this thread and let us know the result for your cruise aboard the Equinox.  Exactly the same situation as you with three adjoining cabins on this same ship in June with the same plan of requesting they open the balcony partitions.  Had no issue the last time we sailed the Equinox with this request but that was several years ago so maybe it's changed.

If this is indeed a new policy would be curious to learn the rationale behind it.  One would think with the multibillion dollar debt they are dealing with, along with recent cutbacks in food/quality, reduction in OVC offerings at dinner, new room service charges, etc., and then dealing with the fallout of these decisions from unhappy cruisers, they wouldn't have the time or inclination to worry about a policy to not open connecting balcony partitions at a customers request?  But that's just my way of thinking.  😊

Regardless, I hope that you have a wonderful cruise aboard a truly great ship! 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Reel Love said:

Aww nuts!  Was any explanation provided?  

No explanation given. I should have probably followed up with someone, but didn’t. Heard a few other people talking about it.  I couldn’t figure out what the reasoning was, had no problems on other cruises. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The requirement to have opening balcony dividers (for firefighting reasons, not passenger comfort) were as a result of the Star Princess fire in 2006.  So, any ship built before this does not have to have dividers that open, unless cabins have been added after 2006 (like the Summit).  Most ships built before 2006 have not gone to the expense of replacing older non-openable dividers for openable ones.

 

The reasons that dividers cannot be opened are:  If the two cabins are in different fire zones (on either side of one of the hallway doors), then the dividers cannot be opened as this breaks the fire zone boundary.  Otherwise, most ships have policies as to how many total dividers can be opened, and how many in a row, as the dividers act as fire breaks.

 

It is also up to the Captain's personal risk tolerance to decide whether to allow dividers to be opened or not.

Edited by chengkp75
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the Reflection last August, we had it opened between our two Sky suites. Our butler opened it up for us when we boarded. My sister and BIL were in the cabin next to us. We have adjoining Sky Suites again this year on the Apex and I have seen pictures of them open on social media posts in E class ships. So unless the policy has REALLY changed we plan to open them again. I know IV cabins do not have partitions that can be opened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, chengkp75 said:

The requirement to have opening balcony dividers (for firefighting reasons, not passenger comfort) were as a result of the Star Princess fire in 2006.  So, any ship built before this does not have to have dividers that open, unless cabins have been added after 2006 (like the Summit).  Most ships built before 2006 have not gone to the expense of replacing older non-openable dividers for openable ones.

 

The reasons that dividers cannot be opened are:  If the two cabins are in different fire zones (on either side of one of the hallway doors), then the dividers cannot be opened as this breaks the fire zone boundary.  Otherwise, most ships have policies as to how many total dividers can be opened, and how many in a row, as the dividers act as fire breaks.

 

It is also up to the Captain's personal risk tolerance to decide whether to allow dividers to be opened or not.


I call bullish!t on this. We were on the Star Princes fire cruise and that ship, and many prior to that, had balcony dividers that opened. Firefighters are not running down balconies putting out the fire. They are pouring water from above.  In fact the reason for the extent of the fire was because they didn’t have automatic fire suppression (sprinklers) on the balconies themselves. The only room that had damage was one where the cabin fire suppression didn’t work. Princes ships now have fire suppression on the balconies and I make notice when I’m on a ship that doesn’t have it. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wording stands corrected, the partitions were "not readily openable".  Fire teams on the cruise ships I've worked all have the key to open dividers since the Star Princess, and the locks are redesigned.  And, as someone who has extensive shipboard firefighting experience and training, yes, the fire teams would have been going from balcony to balcony on the deck of the fire, so as to get water into the cabins on fire from the outside, which you cannot do from above.  Unless you are standing on the balcony directly above the fire, you cannot direct a hose stream of water into the cabin below, and even then it does not go very far into the cabin, simple geometry.  Also, directly above the fire is the worst place to try to fight it from.  On Star Princess, the fire teams were trying to chop through the dividers to provide firefighting from the outside into the cabins.  Ships are not required to have fire suppression (sprinklers) on balconies, if they have smoke detectors there.  The real reason for the extent of the fire was the fact that the balcony furniture, deck covering, and the divider partitions themselves were all highly combustible materials.  This has also been remediated by requiring non-combustible materials in these areas.

 

And, I dispute the statement that only one cabin had damage.  One of the findings was that the glass balcony doors, with aluminum frames were not fire rated, and many either exploded or the frames melted in, allowing fire into the cabins.  You can see in any picture of the Star Princess after the fire, where many balcony doors had failed and were completely missing, so how could the fire have not entered these cabins?  168 hi-fog sprinkler heads activated in the fire, 9 in the area did not activate.  The worst damage was one cabin where the sprinkler head did not activate.  Many cabins were damaged by the balcony doors failing, and the fire damage confined to the area directly adjacent to the door, but the sprinklers kept the spread from going further into the cabin.

 

And, as noted in the MAIB report, a large contributory factor to the fire's spread was the wind generated by the ship's speed along the side of the ship.  Closed dividers help to stop this wind tunnel.

Edited by chengkp75
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back to the original discussion as I’ve taken us off topic. I’ve never been told on Princess, ever, that they wouldn’t open the dividers for us . Every single cruise they have opened them when we asked. I’ve never asked on Celebrity but I was assuming we won’t have push back this trip. I hope we don’t. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • Forum Jump
    • Categories
      • Welcome to Cruise Critic
      • ANNOUNCEMENT: Set Sail Beyond the Ordinary with Oceania Cruises
      • ANNOUNCEMENT: The Widest View in the Whole Wide World
      • New Cruisers
      • Cruise Lines “A – O”
      • Cruise Lines “P – Z”
      • River Cruising
      • ROLL CALLS
      • Cruise Critic News & Features
      • Digital Photography & Cruise Technology
      • Special Interest Cruising
      • Cruise Discussion Topics
      • UK Cruising
      • Australia & New Zealand Cruisers
      • Canadian Cruisers
      • North American Homeports
      • Ports of Call
      • Cruise Conversations
×
×
  • Create New...